Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

Started by Jack Noskills, July 03, 2012, 08:01:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@TK

What would happen if you took 10 small transformers, each with an Rx loop on the primary, nothing else. Then identify each secondary polarity ends and put the secondaries in series and check the output against your Tx.

The ultimate Tx would be with a variable frequency that you can then hone in on the best for any device. Imagine if you could adjust distance/angle of the Tx/Rx plus the Tx frequency.

But, mostly, I would love to see your Tx run an Rx that drives a JouleTheif(s) as a remote battery replacement. Wonder what the result would be. If it can run a motor, it can run an OU device and permit you to show no batteries in your OU device.

Also, what would happen if the Rx has multi-loops.

He, he.

wattsup

T-1000

Quote from: avalon on July 26, 2012, 08:01:23 PM
I can't help thinking about the simularities of your experiment with olne of Don Smith's (one Tx coil - multiple tunes Rx coils).
You mentioned 'above 500kHz' so you wevelength is about 600 meters. Don Smih was using about 36 kHz - that's about 8.3 km.

It would be interesting to check if there is a reletionship between the operting frequency and the distance where the effect is at peak.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjCc16Mf4lI

TinselKoala

That's interesting... but I noticed this video in the list of similar ones.... look at the schematic on the board ! It's the same as mine, almost exactly. A Royer oscillator, in other words. I don't think that's exactly what is driving his transmitter coil, though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SpadJ03stqU#!

The presenter is at first showing a hybrid capacitative-inductive system involving high voltages. It's pretty neat, but I don't think you can pick up that transmitter by hand while it's operating. Later he shows a system like mine, but I can't tell if he's getting that "sn" effect.
It's interesting that the HV system is transferring power between the aircore resonators over longer range, and then the loop receiver converts that into low voltage high current, but only short range. Neat stuff, I wish I could remember more of the Russian I studied 30 years ago.
In the last part of the video he shows extending the range using multiple loops at apparently no power increase. That's great, a significant result that I had only seen hints of, because I don't have enough _room_ to spread out like that !!

JouleSeeker

Thanks for your replies, TK. 
As regards OU, I would like to see measurement of the input power from the battery, and the output power on the load at the receiver. 

I'm most interested in your SN mode... very curious.  Yes, this sort of "anomalous" behavior is what it's all about IMO.

Off topic again-- I've been thinking about two research communities, the FE community represented here and the Cold Fusion CF --> now Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) community.  No connection, right?  I'm wondering.  I've got a foot in both communities now, and I see similarities in goals -- and some observations.  The LENR community sees excess heat occasionally, but sightings of nuclear signatures are generally missing!

What if the "real" portion of the "LENR" effect is not nuclear in origin at all, but rather anomalous EM energy? (i.e., FE)  that's an hypothesis.


{We need a better name than "free energy" -- too many misleading connotations IMO.  Anomalous ElectroMagnetic Energy (AEME) might be better..}   On further reflection, the EM force has been subsumed with the Weak force, "unified", so that physicists now speak of the "ElectroWeak force" as one force in nature, along with gravity and the strong-nuclear force.  So I come to -- Anomalous ElectroWeak Energy, AEWE, pronounced  "awe".

There is a big LENR conference in Korea next month, still with "CF" in the title, ICCF17.  Interesting stuff...    Are the two communities actually reading the same book, while speaking different languages and not communicating much at all?

avalon

Quote from: T-1000 on July 27, 2012, 09:22:05 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjCc16Mf4lI
Tha's not it. In your video the guy shows the effect of tuned LC circuits vs untuned. I would be interested to see the frequency-distance relationship (tuned or untuned). In other words, I am interested to see if there is a standing wave effect in the original TKs videos.