Bada-Bingg!

And...

We get a promise of ANOTHER WEEK'S DELAY, instead of yesterday's promised video.

This would be laughable if it wasn't just so damn funny.

I'm of a firm belief now that "our academics" or "academic advises" is a "fib mechanism" or defensive mechanism that Rosemary hides behind when she is confronted with information that deviates too far from her preconceived belief system.  It's a pressure release/subterfuge mechanism so she doesn't have to deal with difficult issues and doesn't have to deal with the stress related to her thought patterns being challenged.  Whenever there is a bone of contention "the academics" invariably pop up.

It's another form of hiding.  Just like she was "hiding" behind the fact that the schematic was not the correct one for a full month.  In her mind she rationalizes it and it all makes sense.

Run for the hills!

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 05, 2012, 06:56:56 PM
Can anyone give me the link to the video Ainslie promised to post YESTERDAY, showing her duplication of the conditions resulting in the questionable scope traces?

Golly ... it takes time to get participants to knowingly engage in questionable activities or even paid actors to make a fraudulent video.  Just look how long the last YouTube video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc ) Rosemary aka "Dooziedont" took to be produced and the quality was so poor it only took days to figure out it was a big hoax.  So this NEW video Rosemary produces must be of higher quality as to better confuse the viewers with more hand waving, misdirection and misinformation. 

The "LIVE" broadcast Rosemary referenced that's now somehow impossible giving her readers bogus information, incorrect specifications and requirements for her to do a "LIVE" broadcast .... then the loss of four (4) usb web cameras that disappeared from "inside" Rosemary's home in separate incidents  ( what a joke she is )

So .... here's a video that can be watched closely in the interlude, that's more credible and factual than any YouTube video Rosemary can produce for our viewing pleasure of her claimed COP>INFINITY device(s).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqO5R6lljEY   

FTC

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on August 06, 2012, 04:39:58 AM

So .... here's a video that can be watched closely in the interlude, that's more credible and factual than any YouTube video Rosemary can produce for our viewing pleasure of her claimed COP>INFINITY device(s).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqO5R6lljEY   

FTC

Hi fuzzy
That's a great video, and that's the noise in Rosemary's head when anyone is telling her the truth

See no truth
Hear no truth
Speak no truth

And the Ainslie comedy of error and mendacity continues this morning.... another day of NO TESTING by the NERD. But that doesn't stop the mendacity.

Hey, gmeast....

I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION, and I KNOW THE ANSWER.

And the fact that you are ASKING the question.... probably means that you have once again noticed that you cannot possibly duplicate her reported heat results using an honest 3.7 percent ON duty cycle in the COP > 17 circuit... with or without the flyback diode, with or without the 555 timer, with or without fancy mosfet drivers.


And... frankly.... to avoid reference to Fuzzy's work on this issue --- because she doesn't agree with it --- is PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT of the most egregious kind. Ignore my work if you like, I don't mind, but Fuzzy has done by far the most and best work on this issue, bar none, and has placed ALL his data, procedures and results in the public domain for reference.

To attempt to keep gmeast from knowing about this information.... is one of the worst acts of mendacity that I have yet seen from Ainslie.