Quote from: fletcher on August 29, 2012, 04:18:21 PM
But it burnt down in a night.

LOL - sorry Wayne - couldn't resist the windfall moment to drop in a one liner 


Sincerely, good luck to you & the replicators with the build projects - I am looking forward to the results.


Final dignified acceptance of new physics understanding that would shake the foundation of the world is a series of often hard won, sometimes feral, skirmishes for intellectual real estate, fought for in every laboratory & garage, one at a time - until there is no more high ground to take & flags to teardown, & hearts & minds to defeat.

Perfectly funny!

Thank you!

Wayne

Mrwayne, it looks like you just updated your website.

http://hydroenergyrevolution.com/index.php/current-objectives

"...I talked to Mark - and he is like the rest of the world - "ready for the delays to be over" Remember that the model I have - was from my theory - before the engineers improved upon it - it is tough to get it to show what it was not designed for - full and continuous run - it works perfectly to show input and output - and the Free Energy.
I have promised that if our team does not meet our objective due to the original design and changes we made in this system - we will quickly divert our efforts to the optimized smaller model.;....."

***************

If you are wise and still think you have free energy to show, why not go back to the extreme basics and try to do a simple demo model of what you paid webby to do.  But with clear and exact measurments for all to see.  Then go from there.

Johnny, please stop with the flame war posts here. 

Thank you,

Bill

Hey Se3d,

How's things going with your new updated simulation?

I've a couple of questions for you on the vid's currently online. I don't really understand everything that's going on, so bare with me, these may seem a little dumb but I'm bold enough to ask in just case they aren't.

1. In video 3, it appears that as the piston rises, the riser is slowly sinking. Is that correct? If so, I can only assume this is because the buoyant force from H1/H2 is slowly reducing as the riser rises out of that chamber. But is that enough to cause the "sinking" that is apparent? What am I missing?

2. What is the density you are using for the riser. Does it matter? Would this make a difference to the overall output force in the simulation, i.e would something less dense make the system more efficient by producing more output force?

Quote from: seamus103 on August 30, 2012, 01:50:18 AM
And I think I might have challenged you to describe the effect clearly in a way that used standard physics terminology.  This is absolute rubbish.  How can anyone believe such illogical ranting?

Seamus, Seamus01, Seamus02, Seamus03 -
You have skirted moderation - You have proven you can sling mud and make insults.
Make a factual claim or try to learn the system.
I ask - How can you not see the capabilities of the ZED technology - it has been handed to you in at least four separate forms?
Wayne