Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

Started by Jack Noskills, July 03, 2012, 08:01:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jack Noskills

In this case winding direction does not matter, only the polarities which you can easily find out by swapping the second coil. In the junction of the two coils polarities must be the same at the same time instant.

qwert, I have read the patent and there is usefull information there. Problem with it is that you need to tune it every time load changes. With this setup this tuning is not required, atleast not at 50 Hz frequency when coil impedance is high enough.

I will try to make normal tank circuit using goldwave, if I can find resonant frequency somehow then maybe I can proceed.

e2matrix

Jack,  take a look at this pic posted in the Kapanadze thread by vdomov as the 'secret' to TK's device:
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/7876/kappy.png

See some similarities to what you have been doing?  I know it's different but the way the transformers are hooked up looks surprisingly similar.

forest

Quote from: Jack Noskills on September 01, 2012, 04:38:28 AM
In this case winding direction does not matter, only the polarities which you can easily find out by swapping the second coil. In the junction of the two coils polarities must be the same at the same time instant.

qwert, I have read the patent and there is usefull information there. Problem with it is that you need to tune it every time load changes. With this setup this tuning is not required, atleast not at 50 Hz frequency when coil impedance is high enough.

I will try to make normal tank circuit using goldwave, if I can find resonant frequency somehow then maybe I can proceed.

Questions:
1. Did you used secondaries placed on E+I core on center "leg" ? If so then maybe winding direction does not matter. I'm trying to use transformer with 0 core (two "c" cores together) , bobbins are on each side of "0"
2. Do you think that your original modification have the same amount of windings in primary and secondary and the same length of wire (roughly) ? Do you think it may be important ?


Jack Noskills

Quote from: forest on September 07, 2012, 02:27:55 PM
Questions:
1. Did you used secondaries placed on E+I core on center "leg" ? If so then maybe winding direction does not matter. I'm trying to use transformer with 0 core (two "c" cores together) , bobbins are on each side of "0"
2. Do you think that your original modification have the same amount of windings in primary and secondary and the same length of wire (roughly) ? Do you think it may be important ?

I have used E-I with two similar coils, toroid using interleaved coils made using Litz wire and toroid using two separate coils and they all worked.
It is worth a try to use step up, but I dont have enough data to prove if it works or not.