Gwandau
Just for the record ,We are all "Faithers"......... to the last man. [and a girl or two??]
END OF STORY !!

>.<         [thats a period in there]

Its just your particular "Flavor" that is open to discussion.

Until a hard tangible Asset is manifest in some way [undeniable proof].

But that should be profoundly obvious......

Thx
Chet
PS
@ Bruce
I also appreciate you taking the time to explain these things from your perspective [eatins questions],some of those questions have disturbed me for quite some time.

Thank you

Chet

Quote from: Bruce_TPU on October 06, 2012, 02:50:16 PM
My answers in bold!

sadistic crap is not legitimized by florid prose... 

and thank you AGAIN for ANOTHER tacit admission that you do not consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... since you have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to validate your gawd.

Quote from: ramset on October 06, 2012, 04:17:25 PM
Gwandau
Just for the record ,We are all "Faithers"......... to the last man. [and a girl or two??]
END OF STORY !!

>.<         [thats a period in there]

just for the record... we are all atheists.  i just have 'faith' in one less godfairy than you do. when you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why i dismiss yours.
END OF STORY !!

>.<

Quote from: ramset on October 06, 2012, 10:09:03 AM
It was not my intent to insult .

yes it was... and your apology is not accepted. your sins are held bound.

You stand on Weak ground Sir...........
I am not so sure you can Quantify that particular transgression as a Sin.

Twas but a mere mention.....an observation on my part...Not even sure it would Qualify as "idle talk"?[speak]

Yes ..lacking the full resolve on my part to investigate the motives of others ,Twas a statement made in a moment of Devine missguided zeal........[which I regret for "gentlemenly" reasons [sans apology]]

You have not fully Shown intent [to out right Sin]

And since..... If I were to be percieved as an idiot or stupid ....said condition would absolve me of all Sin ""in context""[chapter 7 ,page 23 ,2nd paragraph .]

Nope ,holding a sin under such conditions "Bound"!!
not even technically accurate.
you have backed yourself into a corner !!

A rookie mistake..............

Come back when you have your "game on".........

Spankyou very much!!
Chet
Ps
and of course as usual I hope I made lots of spelling mistakes [not a sin either!! [gotta double check that one]""in context""]