I kind of understand TK.
Talk to you soon I will send you a PM tomorrow, have something interesting for you and Mark E.
Mark

Still nothing from Ainslie except the usual mishmash of miseducated mendacity about her circuit. No reproduction of the Figure 3 scopeshot, no indication that she's watched my videos or read .99's .pdf analysis from last year. She's still making the false claims and unsupported conjectures.

Do you recall when I first built this circuit two years ago and started testing it? I assembled it with a tight layout and no stray wiring, all five mosfets were on a short bus system very close together and the entire board was maybe 4x6 inches. And it would not oscillate! The schematic was correct but it would not oscillate until I removed the mosfets from the board and provided them with about the same lengths of wire leads that I saw on Ainslie's board. Voila! Oscillations.
So here's Yet Another Challenge, for Ainslie who does not believe that her oscillations are due to stray inductances and capacitances. Build the circuit using conventional layout, with minimal wiring length, bus wires, and short leads. Does it still oscillate? If it doesn't, what must you conclude?


Of course doing true experiments and forming conclusions based on data is not Ainslie's strong point, is it.



Ainslie said,

QuoteAnd Poynty - just a point of order.  Please do NOT use any downloads that TK posts.  There are those that he has no right to - and the data is NOT technically mine - but belongs to an academic associated with us.  They were first rifled from my computer and soon thereafter they stole my entire computer.

Ainslie lies. She cannot point to a SINGLE BIT OF INFORMATION that I have posted that she did not herself first post publicly. Not one. She's had ample opportunity to indicate, with links, just which posts of mine contain this "rifled, stolen" information, but she cannot even do that much. I've provided ample evidence already that the scopeshots were posted by her. What else is there? Excerpts from her manuscripts publicly posted, names of contact persons that she continually drops, saying they are "contactable"..... She cannot point to one single item that I've posted that she did not post publicly first. She accuses me and MrSean2k of rifling her computer, and implies that we somehow had a hand in a physical break-in and theft... and she has no evidence whatsoever to back herself up. As usual.

So we have some experimental challenges building up. Ainslie promised over and over to refute my video demonstrations, but she cannot. Ainslie has boasted over and over that she can repeat the Figure 3 scopeshot with all mosfets working.... but she cannot.  Let her or her supporters build the ciruit with tight layout and see if it oscillates. If it doesn't, then Yet Another of her absurd claims is proven false. Ainslie claims that she has real engineers supporting her--- but they are not available for dialog. She repeatedly demands other people's actual identities... but she never has and never will provide the names and contact information for these people she claims are working with her. Ainslie claims publications, and peer review. But her only publications have been the Quantum magazine article concerning the single mosfet circuit, with all its errors and false claims, and the postings of her manuscripts on Rossi's vanity blog, where they have gotten no review at all, as is evidenced by the contradictory schematics, missing data and false claims made without support in the posted manuscripts. She fails to mention that a similar manuscript was rejected five times by various IEEE journals, not even passing the editor much less the reviewers.

@TK
I see she is still trying hard to convince other's of her magical circuit.Below is a scope shot of a circuit i am working on at the moment. Channel 1(the yellow trace) is across a 1 ohm CSR from P/in,and channel 2(the blue trace)is across another 1 ohm CSR to the load.Both voltages are at 12 volts.
Do you think i should get a paper written about my setup? lol.

@TK
As a fan of your channel since resonance effects for everyone videos, this is just my my thoughts after two years of reading pretty much every post about this subject.
I see a lot of petty back and fourth posts/comments/stupid pictures/snide remarks mostly from RA to a lot of members which brings me to make this post.
For an insult to diminish your public image, the public has to believe it is true. For an insult to diminish your self-image or self-esteem, you have to believe it is true. An insult cannot diminish your stature because your self-image is not your self. An insult may cause you to reassess your self-image or self-esteem.
Revenge is often sought as a remedy for humiliation; perhaps using the phrase "protecting honor" as justification. But revenge cannot be an effective remedy for humiliation, because it does nothing to increase your stature.
Humiliation is more demeaning and hurtful than "taking offense" at something. "Taking offense" is cognitive; you have questioned, disagreed with, or attacked my beliefs and perhaps my values. We disagree, and I think you are wrong. Offense is intellectual; it is about what I think. "Humiliation" is visceral; you have attacked me, my being, my self, and made me feel foolish about who I am. The attack is personal and credible enough that you have caused me to doubt my own worth, and thereby induced my shame. Humiliation is existential; it is about who I am.
Humiliation has been linked to academic failure, low self-esteem, social isolation, underachievement, marital conflict, delinquency, abuse, discrimination, depression, learned helplessness, social disruption, torture, and even death. People in power (like having you're own forum, with no real hierarchy or freedom if speech)  use humiliation as a form of social control; it is a common tool of oppression. The fear of humiliation is also a powerful motivating force.
So victims of humiliation may be able to achieve resolution through either of two paths. The first is to reappraise the humiliating experience in some way that acknowledges the victim's strength and ability to cope with a difficult situation. This approach increases self-confidence and diminishes the fear of humiliation. The second path is to leave the degrading environment and find a more appreciative environment.
This is most of our points, do something new, and we (your peers) will appreciate whatever you being to us from your laboratory.  We are all fully aware of the situation, and understand that you have been pushed to the limit with her actions, and in my personal opinion I would love to see your energy directed towards everything BUT this.
As I said before, long time fan of your work, but its really starting to shit me that she is diverting your time to this nonsense.
Other than that, thanks for the new Arduino videos, you got me motivated!
Stumpy.

@Stumpy:
Thank you for your comments. Believe me, I am fully aware of the psychological dynamics of this situation. And since you are clearly watching my videos, I think you can tell that the Ainslie situation does not really consume a lot of my time. 

However..... efforts to change the status quo should be directed at Ainslie, I think. I'm not about to "walk away" when that creature is actually canvassing friends and possible and potential employers, trying to find out my real name and address and trying to sully my reputation with them with her lies, while at the same time continuing to make her false claims, harassing people and attempting to gain monetary awards for her nonsense.
If she wants to carry out her "research" and post it on her private forum, fine, LEAVE ME OUT OF IT. After, of course, refuting my challenges and my statements about her and her claims. But that is not what she's doing, is it. She refers to me constantly in the most insulting manner possible and she adds false claim upon false claim on a daily basis, it seems, and never manages to provide any support.

She's accused me of all kinds of ridiculous things, like hacking her computer, stealing files, and even orchestrating physical breakins into her compound. She's threatened me with all kinds of threats, legal, computer-directed and even physical, and she lies about my replications of her circuitry and my testing of them. In short..... it's personal, and every time she pops up her head with another claim about her "reviewed" and "published" daft manuscripts, which are neither, and another "Ickle Pickle" slur, I'll be there with my database of facts, references, and fully repeatable demonstrations that show, to all concerned, just what she is and what her "research" consists of.

This present thread, for example, wasn't started by me until _after_ she had already snivelled on her promise of the June 1 demonstration, that she promised for many months, finally settling on a date and advertising it on PESN, with the usual set of false claims and insults directed towards me and the many other replicators who found the truth about her and her circuitry claims. When she called it off... as I predicted she would.... then I started this thread to challenge her continuing line of BS. It's a return stroke to her serve.... and she has yet to volley, and will not manage ever to do so. If she does manage to pull off a demonstration on June 22, which I doubt, it will be the same old same old and most certainly will Not show any refutations of my work or my assertions about hers... because I am right.

Meanwhile, I'll still be doing my thing, making amazing effects with properly switched mosfets, with overunity COP ratios, that, calculated by her chosen method, would be in the thousands. Sorry... I can't quite manage the COP INFINITY that she often claims... but then neither can she.

And of course my vacuum plasma work continues as do my extreme high voltage investigations and my Arduino learning adventures. I've actually written around a hundred different little application sketches for Arduino, doing everything from Sous Vide crockpot cooker control to 3-d multiplexed cube displays to the present toying around with the software FFT color organ light show and realtime audio signal processing... and the "processing" application itself. There are lots of much better Arduino tutorials than what I'm putting up and I learn a lot from watching them, and I'm really starting to get the hang of coding. I taught myself c++ in college but never liked it much then and didn't use it for anything really, but now the c++ coding is really clicking and starting to be a lot of fun.


@TinMan:
Sure, why not. Your scope shot proves that you can at least manage to make and post your own scopeshots, perform your own demonstrations, answer questions when they are put to you, and provide evidence that you are doing as you say. That puts you _way ahead_ of Ainslie and all her ilk. I'll bet you haven't written a single letter demanding that a busy "academic" pay attention to your reams of word-salad "thesis" either, have you.

From working with you in the past I know that you are careful to avoid making claims you can't back up with demonstrations, and that you are happy to admit when you don't know something and to take advice from those who might be a page or two ahead of you in the book. Personally, I find your explorations a lot more interesting than Ainslie's tired old "zipon" fantasies which explain nothing and predict nothing, and your experimental work is accomplished with a lot more panache and direction than hers is, and should be seen as an example for those who follow. I don't always agree with your conclusions nor you with mine but we manage to discuss matters productively for both of us, and I've had fun with your circuits that I've tested.

Nice that you got hold of a 2-channel scope, and are willing to share data from it. Cheers.... and I hope it has finally cooled off a bit for you, we are already into the 35 degree days here with 40 to come next month.

--TK