NRamaswami

Thank you very much for your contribution.
Your posts make much sense to me (not EE also)
This quadrifilar primary you mentioned is (Tesla) series, or 4 insulated wires winded & connected in parallel ?

regards
Alvaro

Thanks for the good words..I actually did not expect to see good words on my posts..

Quadfilar wire is wound like this..

All wires run in parallel. End of first wire is connected to beginning of second. End of second connected to beginning of third and end of third connected to beginning of fourth wire. Input given to beginning of first wire and taken out at the end of fourth wire. I do not know how it is described in the Electrical engineering terminology..

Quadfiliar is primary.

First wind a single wire as a step down component and upon that wind the quadfilar primary. 

The components are like this NS - NS - NS Opposite poles always face each other in this set up. It can be SN-SN-SN as well.

The output from the first primary electromagnet goes to the input of the third electromagnet the second electromagnet acting only as a step up secondary. All three secondaries are connected in series to increase the voltage and amperage.

Results can be replicated and verified easily by any one..

QuoteMaking the device self sustaining is of no problem really. The output is high voltage and higher amperage. Secondary current will flow in the direction opposing the primary current. When you provide a step down transformer to use the electricity, the output of the step down transformer will flow in a direction oppising the feeding secondary current. So the output of the transformer will be in phase and synchronise with the primary input. Now all you need is a make before break change over switch and change the source of feeding current to the output of the transformer. A part of the transformer output is enough to keep the unit running. Rest of the transformer output is given to load. The original feeding current is removed and the system will continue to work. I have not done this part. But I think given this information any number of posters here can replicate the results.

I think that you, like many others, pretend to teach what you actually do not know.

If it is "no problem really" to make the device self-sustaining, why have you not done this part? I know why... it is because it is more of a problem than you seem to think, and that YOU CANNOT DO IT.

In other words, you are making claims you cannot support with real data, outside checkable references, facts and calculations, demonstrations of your own.

QuoteWithout access to atmosphere, no device can produce electricity. If you think about it all generators have access to or open to the atmosphere.

Now you are just being silly.

Very well. we will try and post the results but I'm short of cash and we will do it. But I certainly cannot claim any credit for it even if we achive it. 

I suggest that you replicate the experiment and see if the results tally.

Regarding the self sustaining claim, check the patents on Amplidyne a device used extensively during world war II in US and British Navy ships.

If you cannot find the patents let me know and let me post them. In these devices the original current was maintained not removed. But for every watt of feedback current, the output increased by 20000 watts as the patents which are granted indicate.

The point to note is if the feedback current voltage is higher than the original input current, the original current would not go and there is no need for it. This is not theory. This is why Figuera has used a low voltage initial source and the feedback was higher voltage. At that point of time the original current is not needed as it would not go in. To do this all we need to do is build multiple modules and then connect the higher feedback to the original point with low voltage input.

If Radio amplification is doable and agreeable, energy amplification is also practical. This has been done in Amplidyne devices. Same principle was used by Figuera.  I'm sure you would agree if the initial current is not removed, the source of that current can be continuously energised by the output current. Is it not a self sustaining machine then?