F_Brown,

I am attaching the schematic that is in the main pdf as a guideline.  I am not sure how accurate this schematic is and of course we don't have any definitive test and setup information from anywhere right now.  For example, I read comments about the dot convention on the schematic and people were questioning if it was valid or not.  In theory, the two separate windings on the core for the LC resonator should put the flux in the same direction through the core.  On the QEG forum some people were speculating that in fact the flux was going in opposite directions to reduce the effective inductance for the LC resonator to bring the resonant frequency up towards 400 Hz.  That would be crazy because that would cause an AC short circuit which would destroy the energy in the capacitors and kill the resonator.

I am not sure how experienced you are with your simulator, but I do know that if you could see their test waveforms and got all of their measurements and setup data, in theory you could do a quite accurate simulation of the performance of the setup.  You have to take liberties of course, for example you can't simulate the physical action of rotor with respect to what it does electrically, but you can come up with some kind of alternative to what the rotor is doing.  For now, I am assuming what others are assuming.  The assumption is that the spinning rotor causes small currents to flow due to a small remnant magnetization in the core and that bootstraps itself into higher amplitudes because of the power injection from the spinning rotor.

One suggestion for you is to try a voltage source as the stimulation instead of a current source.  A current source will output progressively more power the higher the resistance it sees or the higher the EMF or voltage it has to overcome.  If you do try a voltage source as the stimulation, you will probably have to decouple it from the rest of the simulation with a series resistor.  I am assuming that your voltage source model has an output impedance of zero, and that will lock or force whatever it is driving to be in step with it.  Experimenting with different series resistor values may be necessary.  It's possible that a voltage source with a series resistor will make the LC resonator go to high amplitudes also but it will take a lot of cycles.

Going back to my earlier postings, and looking at the QED schematic, you can see how when the rotor rotates through +45 or -45 degrees, that's when you get the "transient" stimulation and then outside those two angles the stimulation is completely disconnected from the funky LC resonator.

MileHigh

Good thoughts.  I played around a little with different ways to drive the tank.  The way I do it in the images presented was the easiest and most direct.  I'll see what else I can come up with. 

I think the phase dots are wrong.  My first impression is that if one puts two windings with equal amounts of turns in bucking configuration like that, nothing will happen.  They will cancel each other.  Now, there might be some funky redirection of flux going on, although I it's more probable that they would just cancel each other electrically and magnetically, the secondaries as well.  It would be helpful to be able to build one, and probe just what's going on. 

I have to try and figure out what they are even attempting to accomplish with the exciter.  I have a good spark gap model I got for my Tesla Hair Pin simulation.  So I can model the entire exciter well.

Driving the tank with voltage could be done this way, see attached schematic.  Although I'm at a loss as to how to calculate the input power this way.  My attempts to use a serial resistor and a voltage source fail to work well.

In some ways this is a rather interesting thread.

I am a hopeful optimist that humanity will discover and embrace a technology or technologies that will deliver us from the limited utility of deadly polluting fossil fuels and the concomitant financial slavery and philosophical coercion. And I also have a strong personal religious belief and believe that it is possible for a Higher Power to intervene and provide help to us.

I believe that IF God wanted to provide us with free energy then God could inspire someone such as the HopeGirl team and foreign groups to meet and work together to refine and develop and distribute workable reiterations of established free energy technology. I have become tentatively convinced that Tesla discovered and refined and produced working free energy generators. So, in summation, I believe it is possible that HopeGirl and associated parties COULD be acting on genuine inspiration from God.

BUT.....granted that my research and insights on Tesla technology is woefully far from complete, I have to say that the HopeGirl team seems to be utterly clueless about the nature of the Tesla technology. I have not read one word about their understanding of the technology that even comes close to matching the theories and engineering principles that Tesla seems to have been using. It is very difficult to determine what Tesla actually did, he did not exactly leave us a Free Energy For Dummies recipe book! But there is a rather large amount of literature that has been published, including many very insightful commentaries and personal conclusions and descriptions of what he must have been thinking compared to what is verifiably known about his results. And there is a large body of quoted Tesla material containing smatterings of his own descriptions of his technology. So it is possible to compare what HopeGirl team knows compares to what he actually did.

Thus far they are not even in the right ballpark. I could have cried in despair when I read about their using a spark plug as Tesla's spark gap. The spark gap is an extremely crucial item, not just an ornament.

It would delight me to see workable and provable free energy made widely available to humanity. I hope and pray that HopeGirl Team does it. I am earnestly trying to do it.  And it would prove that God can inspire people to do something right even if they do not know what they are doing but are simply willing to trust God and try to do a righteous thing.

It would be wonderful if we do see the Tesla free energy technology resurrected out of its tomb and see it freely roaming to every human who can be benefited by it.


CANGAS 21

Which god?

Indeed.  In a similar vein, I am not a big Tesla reader and all that stuff, but I question the notion of "Tesla free energy technology."  The idea that Tesla left "hints" about this and all that you have to do is "connect the dots" could very well be just wishful thinking mixed together with intentional disinformation.

I can speculate the reason for the intentional disinformation does not from from Big Government or some Evil Cabal, rather it comes from "us" the people that make a living writing books and talking about Tesla and fantasizing about him and worshiping him like he himself is some sort of god.  He did some very great things, like being the first person to engineer the power grid that completely changed society.  But the problem is that it's too "easy" to believe more than that.  So you end up with HopeGirl namedropping "Tesla" and ka-ching!  More people click on the "Donate" button.

MileHigh