The Generator system G can be similar to the "wind turbine" type with characteristics of handlingnon-uniform rotation.  G can be brought - no development necessary.

The unbalanced wheel will be started with Weight W2 at position 1.  Hand rotation may be needed initially.

What is the theoretical COP (Output/Input) of the "Unbalanced Wheel 2SO" shown on the RHS?

If the wheel is started with the Weight W2 at position 1, the pulse energy required to do a complete revolution is tiny. The amount is to overcome friction only. (This assumes no energy from the wheel is transferred to the lever. This assumption is apparent in the video but should be confirmed by actual experimental prototype.)

The Output Energy is W1 x g x h where h is the height raised. h can be increased by increasing L1 and L2 proportionally.

Thus the COP can be extremely high. A COP figure of 12 is easily achievable. It can be much higher with less friction at the axle of the wheel and at the lever pivot.

In other words, the Input Energy (as calculated by the pulse) is independent of Output Energy. All the Output Energy is supplied by the Lead-out Gravitational Energy. Should we have a new understanding due to Lead-out Energy Machines?

ltseung888,

I want to confirm my understanding of the lead-out theory.

What I think you are saying is if you push a pendulum horizontally to the right, then release, two components of energy can be recovered.
Energy#1) Energy that equals the amount of work that was initially done to move the pendulum.
Energy#2) Energy stored in the string as strain, and equals the "weight" times the "drop distance".

I'm not sure if each of the two energy components have to be recovered along the X and Y axes.  That is, Energy#1 from the X axis, and Energy#2 from the Y axis.

Attached is a graphical representation.  Please let me know if my understanding is correct.

 

Quote from: zoelra on September 26, 2014, 02:46:16 PM
ltseung888,

I want to confirm my understanding of the lead-out theory.

What I think you are saying is if you push a pendulum horizontally to the right, then release, two components of energy can be recovered.
Energy#1) Energy that equals the amount of work that was initially done to move the pendulum.
Energy#2) Energy stored in the string as strain, and equals the "weight" times the "drop distance".

I'm not sure if each of the two energy components have to be recovered along the X and Y axes. That is, Energy#1 from the X axis, and Energy#2 from the Y axis.

Attached is a graphical representation. Please let me know if my understanding is correct.

@ zoelra

You are almost right.  The interpretation from the Lee-Tseung Lead-out theory is as follows:

1.    Assume that you apply a force F absolutely horizontally to a pendulum at rest.  The Tension of the String will increase so that the horizontal component of the Tension of the string will be equal to F.  The work done by the force F is equal to FX.  This energy is stored in the pendulum system.  It is not dissipated nor destroyed.

2.    At the same time, the increased Tension of the String will lift the pendulum bob upwards.  The Lee-Tseung Lead-out Theory attributes this lifting up of the bob "uses" Lead-out Gravitational Energy.  This energy WY enters into the pendulum system.

3.    The calculation of FX and WY are then done separately as allowed in standard Physics and Mathematics.  These two components of energy are compared.

4.    For small angles, FX is approximately equal to 2 x WY.  (Two parts of horizontal energy leads out one part of vertical energy).

5.    The total energy in the pendulum system is FX+WY as you have correctly listed.

In standard textbooks,  any resulting energy is automatically assumed to come from the Horizontal Force F only.  No Leading-out of Gravitational Energy is considered.  FX is treated as the only energy that enters the pendulum system.



As you can see, the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy Theory obeys every Law of Physics.  It just looks at the vertical component of energy differently. 



Similarly, in the Milkovic 2-stage pendulum, most people automatically assume the lifting of the Weight W1 as a transfer of energy from the swinging pendulum.  They (including myself for 10 years), looked and did not see that the amplitude of the pendulum oscillation did NOT decrease.  The energy used to lift the Weight W1 must come from somewhere else.  The Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy theory states that it comes from Gravity.  Every Physics Law is obeyed.



The mathematics and physics in the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Theory is correct from day 1 (10 years ago).  Hope this clears up any confusion.

 
Getting another step closer to the Pulse Motor.  I accept the 225 HP Pulse Motor used by the Military in USA and China as scientific reality.  It is a matter of explaining its operation using the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy Theory.


First we accept that:
1.  We can lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy via a setup such as the Milkovic 2SO.  You can wait for a forever running demonstration of a Bessler Type device before formal acceptance.
2.  The Leading-out of gravitational energy is via the varying tension in the string.  The first occurrence is at the pulsing.  The second occurrence is at the point where the clockwise moment (due to weight of W2 and centrifugal force) is greater than the anti-clockwise moment of W1.
3. The pendulum can be replaced by an unbalanced wheel for faster rotation and shorter pendulum length.

The best videos to get to a closer step at the Pulse Motor are from purelyprimitives on the blind Peru Scientist, F.M. Chalkalis Energy Multiplier.

1. F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHhZZ9DuzK4
2. Modified FM Chalkalis Energy Multiplier - 1330% Efficiency
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61-C0x6xtL4
3.  New Balanced Design - 3225% Efficient
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hiNy9JSkrE
4.  Offset Drive Unbalanced Weight - Partial Test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDXFB-KTxBU


From these videos, it should be clear that a 360 degree rotation of an "unbalanced wheel" is effectively used.  (purelyprimitives did not use a full wheel.) In a full rotation, the rotational speed increases and decreases depending on the position of the "weight" and the application of the "friction Pulse".  This leads-out gravitational energy via the simple pendulum mechanism in line with the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy Theory.  purelyprimitives was able to multiply the Input Energy (in reality, leading-out gravitational energy).


Video 1 clearly shows the 360 degree rotation.


Let us focus on the second video.  There were no second stage levers.  The input was via friction to the unbalanced wheel.  The Output Energy as determined by the torque was higher than Input Energy.


Let us focus on the third video.  The "wheel" was balanced but the rotational speed was not constant.  The friction still supplied the pulsing.  Gravitational Energy was brought-in.  The "Pulsing via Friction to rotate and extract via torque at the axle" is another way of using the lead-out gravitational energy.


In Video 4, purelyprimitives used the Milkovic 2SO technique and achieved much better performance.


The Energy Multiplier is NOT a hoax.  Tsinghua University had a similar device for many years.  I was accused as an USA spy because I explained its workings to the American Group who developed the 225 HP Pulse Motor at Tsinghua University in 2006.


The Tong Wheel based on a slice of the 225 HP Pulse Motor was an unbalanced wheel.