Quote from: allcanadian on December 17, 2014, 10:52:54 AMsimply does not apply because it did not include that drunk technician who just inadvertently killed everyone. You see the risks are conditional and change the moment you enter the cause and effect loop unless you opt out or change the conditions.

You are effectively saying it is impossible to generalize risk. By that logic every bite you eat, every step you take (every move you make).  Would require separate risk assessments.  Clearly you don't believe this. 

Quotecontracting polio which WHO has stated no longer exists on this planet.

Again this is incorrect.  From the WHO Q&A on polio. 

Quote from: WHOPolio does still exist, although polio cases have decreased by over 99% since 1988, from an estimated more than 350 000 cases to 416 reported cases in 2013. This reduction is the result of the global effort to eradicate the disease. Today, only 3 countries in the world have never stopped transmission of polio (Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan).

Now the question is, you've mentioned this several times in this thread.  I'm willing to bet you've mentioned it to other people.  Are you going to go back and give them the correct information that you were so very incompetent at collecting?  Didn't think so.  It would be hard even if you wanted to.  Just another reason why you should put the effort into refuting your own ideas before you speak.

Quote from: allcanadian on December 17, 2014, 11:46:18 AMwho live in a world of black and white with no shades of gray.

Quite the opposite. I think there are shades of grey.  You, interestingly are unwilling to believe that shades exist in a few of your beliefs.

So the idea that hCG is being used to sterilize girls in Kenya was refuted because it is too low.  You came back with the statement that ultra-low doses can hurt you but you didn't bother to even have a microscopic amount of skepticism concerning SM's post.

Where were your shades of grey?  You had no doubt whatsoever when it came to talking about "ultra low doses".

You also called parents irresponsible for allowing their children to be vaccinated with guardasil stemming from an article which appears to be a mistreatment of the words of the person the article is about.  Again this was because you didn't bother to have the slightest amount of doubt about the article.

Where were the shades of grey there?

QuoteMaybe you could track down those who's children have been crippled or died due to complications

Complications with what?  Vaccines?  Wait...how do you know they were crippled or died due to vaccine complications?  That's a pretty black or white thing to say.

See the point here is sure I think vaccines are very, very safe.  Not perfectly safe, but neither is being unvaccinated and yes I think you have be deliberately obtuse to believe a number of the things you SM and Cap-Z-ro have said.  I think the best way to understand the shades of grey that exist in this world is to be self-critical.  Something, if you are honest all three of you suck donkey balls at.

SM posts an article and you say "yesssir".  I went and found the actual WHO report.

"Considered safe"...likely by vested interests.

And relying on the WHO as a reliable source is par for the course.

Weren't they the ones pushing the H1N1 vaccine to stem the epidemic which fizzled...despite the fact that hardleyanybody fell for the scam.

You know, the disease where they patented the vaccine 3 0r 4 years before the disease appeared.

Hey...is anybody going to get the new vaccine that makes us immune to Global Warming..er..I mean Climate Change ?

Ever Mike Adams the Health Ranger Dr Oz AND Dr Phil have endorsed this one !

Regards...

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on December 17, 2014, 01:08:38 PM
"Considered safe"...likely by vested interests.

No as testified by human females everywhere.  It is within the nominal values for women.  Again, hCG is BIOSYNTHESIZED so it's entirely reasonable to find some in a woman.  Also for the second time, pregnancy tests are usually hCG tests.  So clearly hCG is safe in some dosage for women.

QuoteAnd relying on the WHO as a reliable source is par for the course.

Nope.  The WHO report publishes both the lab values the Church supplied and the ones they used both are over 5 MILLION times lower that the amount given in a sterilization vaccine.

Again...all you had to do was think that perhaps you might be wrong and you wouldn't have looked stupid here.

Solid Raindrops 50 to 60 feet Long Fall From Sky After Military Jets Fly By

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lkAZTNwq40


Must be more 'Global Warming'..er, I mean 'Climate Change' signs huh ?

Regards...