Quote frm sark:
'In other words you have no end of excuses. I could offer you $20,000, $50,000 or  $100,000 and you would still find a reason not to attempt to publish.

End quote

Damn right mr sarkeizen,until you make me believe that a noble will be handed over for ou.go on,try.those guys who said 'automatic noble'must be rookies or juniors.

Quote frm sark:'Well that's easily the best gift I'm going to get this year: Rather substantial proof, that you are sort of lying to people about your research. '

End quote

In a most perverse twist of fate you will have to find flaw with the laws of thermodynamics in order to substantiate this

Quote from: profitis on December 25, 2014, 05:57:25 PM
Damn right mr sarkeizen,until you make me believe that a noble will be handed over for ou.

I don't have to.  I don't really care.  There were three possible outcomes.

i) You would refuse to make the attempt.
ii) You would make the attempt and fail.
iii) You would make the attempt and succeed.

If ii) you would be embarrassed and I would be happy. If iii) I'd be out a few bucks assuming the Nobel committee doesn't come through.  If i) it provides heavy evidence against the ease and clarity of your proof.

Quote from: sarkeizen
Well that's easily the best gift I'm going to get this year: Rather substantial proof, that you are sort of lying to people about your research.

Quote from: profitisyou will have to find flaw with the laws of thermodynamics in order to substantiate this

Nope.  All I have to show is that you are acting inconsistent with your established interests.   You were effectively being offered a salary to write a paper which you claim would be absolutely easy.  It would be free money, it would establish your research on a global scale (remember according to you your argument has no reasonable counter).  I was happy to make it so that I could not profit from your success.  The only thing you had to do was invest time in writing up a paper for research which you say is already complete and utterly unimpeachable.

Again, Bayes rule says that we have to assume you are kind of lying. 

Mmm tempting mr sarkeizen tempting.I might do it if all else fails.I'm working on a formula for a clock right now.I think everlasting clocks,watches will be a hit and bring reasonable income

And bayes rule only goes to where bayes rule is allowed to go for example,anybody can get rich by robbing a bank yet not many peeps rob banks(I think?)

free energy is super simple
you put DC power into a motor with a 100cm circumference pulley on it
you attach a belt, strap, rope or even a string in a pinch
and then attach at least one AC motor to a 1cm pulley on the same belt
you run the AC output through a full wave bridge rectifier to self power...
your DC input motor,,,,
then you have just created your first free energy electricity multiplier
satan will try to complain about torque, but it is no problem, just think about how easily an electric motor rotates,,,
you could have 10 - 100 AC motors attached, multiplying your input by 1000 - 10 000..
now dont you think this much output power could turn your input DC motor