Quote from: profitis on December 31, 2014, 03:21:21 PM
Have you got any nickel sponge lying around @sarkeizen?

No idea.  Are you going to make yourself a bigger liar? :-) That, when faced with having to reduce the likelihood of OU.  You will now claim that it can only be clearly and unambiguously validated by a very, very, very small population? :-)

Nope.the text-book discrepency can be validated by whomever sees it and whomever wants to validate it,period.got any platinum sponge lying around @sarkeizen?(:

Quote from: profitis on December 31, 2014, 05:40:19 PM
Nope.the text-book discrepency can be validated by whomever sees it and whomever wants to validate it,period.

So in other words OU isn't very likely.  Thanks. :-)

How does your 'unlikely' equate with my 'whomever sees it'? This is incompatible mr sarkeizen.those who prove,beyond a doubt,that such cells obey the law of thermodynamics assymetricly are clear winners.

Quote from: profitis on January 01, 2015, 05:26:44 AM
How does your 'unlikely' equate with my 'whomever sees it'?

It doesn't need to.   Either something is easy and obvious to a very large group of candidates or it isn't.