That's the effect of invisible electrons yes.not the sight of electrons no.yet we're told by the few who noticed individual sightings of electrons that electrons exist.we must believe them and not me?

Quote from: profitis on January 02, 2015, 09:10:48 PM
That's the effect of invisible electrons yes.not the sight of electrons

You realize that everything you see is the effect of something invisible right? Or don't you?

Beside the point.a handful of guys have seen individual electrons footprints.now we all believe that these thingys run through our wires.I could just aswell say a hanful of guys touched californium,now we all believe in the existence of californium.

Quote from: profitis on January 02, 2015, 10:31:03 PM
Beside the point.

Nope.  Exactly the point.  If you are saying "A not B" then A and B have to be different.  You agreed everyone sees the effect of something invisible but not everyone sees the invisible thing.  However "seeing" itself is actually JUST THE EFFECT OF SOMETHING INVISIBLE.

Quotea handful of guys have seen individual electrons footprints

But haven't seen electrons.  All you appear to be saying is that some people saw something that other people did not.  This doesn't seem to require talking about electrons.  You might as well refer to any experience shared by only a few people.

If you don't understand how that's different from what I was describing then you should go back and re-read.

Its not hard to notice the discrepency for discerning individuals and definitely not hard to notice the discrepency once pointed out to someone who didn't see the discrepency by someone who did see the discrepency.your argument is flawed eg. 3000 people read the textbook up to page 5 while twenty read up to page 30.of the twenty who read up to page 30 only 6 are paying attention subtitle concentration cells.of the 6 that are paying attention to subheading concentration cells only one is reading sub-sub-title section on electrode concentration cells.of the one that is paying attention to sub-sub-title electrode concentration cells only 0.25 is paying attention to sub-sub-sub-title gas electrode concentration cells or gas reference electrodes.you're implying that the whole world must jump upndown and celebrate by doing experiments to verify a discrepency which only 26 people notice globaly/week.and you're erroniously concluding that because the global population isn't jumping upndown and celebrating that I must be wrong in my research?