Apophasis:'Im still in the bahamas, .......

Hey send a pic of those pieces-of-ass on those beaches

Quote... the necessitated attribute of pure unmanifest inertia ( IE , the ETHER ITSELF IN ITSELF BY ITSELF).

as a (CRUDE) analogy, dielectricity is to the ETHER what ILLUMINATION is to Light (the Ether itself).

Yes indeed, you are right! Just I comprehend here an another crucial aspect! In this analogy both elements used in a comparative way are meaningless words or mental concepts, without the existence of the observer. The Dielectricity is to Ether as what is Illumination to Light only because "I, that I am" or "I that, I am" very aware of their existence, of these another aoristos dyas. The observer is the one who express the necessitativeness of this attribute (ananke - which is not a definite term, at least in my point of view) and its manifestation. He's the one who disturb the pure unmanifested inertia. The same reasoning and meaning could be expressed for the dot-line diad as an inseparable whole. Then who's the observer?

Now going back to the last century dielectricity, known today as electrostatics and defined as a propriety of matter (i.e. ~10^-12 size of nucleus from the entire volume of a Democritus atom - another wrong concept) to attract or repel other matter, phenomena based on something called electrical charge which manifest as a duality, attraction-repulsion (another wrong concept), and generally identified with a small particle called electron (another wrong concept), which is when particle, when wave, and based on which was further developed the nowadays well known electrical current as a flow of electrons trough wires (of course a totally wrong concept but which continue to shape the reality according to is assigned meaning), now, I wonder rhetorically how can it be used other ways than it actually is? Because if Ether has no intrinsic proprieties, the dielectricity must have for sure!

 

QuoteNow going back to the last century dielectricity, known today as electrostatics and defined as a propriety of matter (i.e. ~10^-12 size of nucleus from the entire volume of a Democritus atom - another wrong concept) to attract or repel other matter, phenomena based on something called electrical charge which manifest as a duality, attraction-repulsion (another wrong concept), and generally identified with a small particle called electron (another wrong concept), which is when particle, when wave, and based on which was further developed the nowadays well known electrical current as a flow of electrons trough wires (of course a totally wrong concept but which continue to shape the reality according to is assigned meaning), now, I wonder rhetorically how can it be used other ways than it actually is? Because if Ether has no intrinsic proprieties, the dielectricity must have for sure!

Sadang: Can you give me an exact reference of dielectricity being know today as electrostatics. I was reading JJ Thompson and Farady and cant find anything like that. If you have a clear book reference please let me know or PM it to me. Now  when you wonder how to be used in other ways than it actually is -- what are you exactly referring to? The ether have "modalities" according to Ken's video # 18. I think what you are asking is how can you relate what we know of "conventional " electric theory to ether theory. I am having the same question as to how to understand the dielectric in a practical way that I can assign to it a way of doing a very simple circuit. Maybe I need to go further down the videos and book , but his video # 18  showed me something I was wondering about the dielectric plane on the magnet graphic he shows. In the most baisc circuit, a battery , a switch and a light bulb, how can I apply all this dielectric theory to see it working I guess we both have to read much more.

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on March 31, 2015, 10:05:13 PM


electricity has transverse phenomena,  EM as a induction max relational to its spatial manifestation/ perturbations.


ie speed of EM / light.



Electricity is  Phi x Psi = Q in Planck's , electrification.




Electricity terminates AS magnetism , not INTO magnetism, by losing its dielectric component as necessitated;

electricity is the product of Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity), is definitionally a hybrid Ether modality of the product of Phi and Psi.

Ken: In your video # 18,.. how will the graphic be if instead of AC in 2 transmission lines next to each other it would be a DC current (and both flowing in the same direction?) how will the graphic change if the magnetic field is not once against the other ? (which I think is because we are using AC? Is the ether dividing itself while it travels thru the transmission line(in 2 modalities-dielectricity and magnetism), and the dielectric "travels" thru the inside of the line while the magnetic "travels" by the outside? Could it be seen like that ? Is that what you mean that the dielectriciy terminates as magnetism by losing its dielectric component?? ( the dielectric component having to stay in just one plane inside a coil magnet ,leaving the rest just as magnetic vortices that  try to go back to equilibrium by joining the dielectric plane ?

If all waves and matter are just forces pressing upon themselves in oscillation one might ask: where did these forces come from?these 'perturbuations'.what actually is manifesting from nothing? Freaky shit guys this thread is beginning to scare me