In just a few hours we have two more pages and none of them support any of EMJ's claims.

Quote from: MarkE on April 26, 2015, 09:49:03 PM
In just a few hours we have two more pages and none of them support any of EMJ's claims.

More Contrivance from the King of ASSUMPTION's - Support it does young Padawan Learner!!!

Quote from: MarkE on April 26, 2015, 09:49:03 PM
In just a few hours we have two more pages and none of them support any of EMJ's claims.

Please feel free to point out mistakes MarkE - or are you scared you will end up with your Foot in your Mouth like last time?

Again, it is well known to Engineers that when a Transformer is properly Loaded, there is a Net Zero Magnetic Field in the Transformer. Where the Ampere Turns AT are Equal but Opposite to each other.

Why?

Lenz's Law:

Quote from: EMJunkie on April 26, 2015, 11:41:09 PM

Again, it is well known to Engineers that when a Transformer is properly Loaded, there is a Net Zero Magnetic Field in the Transformer. Where the Ampere Turns AT are Equal but Opposite to each other.

Why?

Lenz's Law:

You keep repeating this false claim of net zero flux in the transformer even after the truth has been explained to you.  In an idealized, forward connected transformer, secondary current generates additional flux that is identically canceled by equal and oppositely oriented additional flux in the primary over and above the primary magnetization flux.  The primary magnetization flux depends on the integral of 1/L_PRIMARY*Edt .  It is independent of the secondary current, secondary flux, and coupling factor.