Quote from: NickZ on June 29, 2015, 11:38:37 AM
  I'm glad that we can agree on something, even if it may be for the wrong reasons.

Please note that I deleted my agreement after you had modified your post. 

Quote from: NickZ on June 20, 2015, 03:05:43 PM
Some others may still be on the old wild goose chase, looking for NMR, in all the wrong places.

NMR does not deserve derision. It is a phenomenon that actually happens in the real world.
If you are looking to laugh off an unknown M.O., then concentrate on EM induced transmutation.

  Ok then. But, something other than stuck fets are the cause of such KW output levels, even if Ruslan's device is only actually outputting about 1.500 watts, or so, from what I see.  As a real 4000w output would light up that whole field, at night. And each bulb added dims the previous ones,
since they are sharing the same output power.  Or he is able to hit on a higher resonant peak, that allows for such increase in power levels.
  I aim to find out...  even if it's the last thing I do.

  Verpies:
  Not laughing off anything. But, NMR has not been proved to be the cause of the Kapanadze/Akula/Ruslan device effects.
  As I know that you only believe in what you can see, feel, or measure with existing instruments, so, I won't get into FIELD EFFECTS, with you.
  Let's just agree to disagree until there is further proof, one way or the other.

Quote from: NickZ on June 29, 2015, 11:57:38 AM
  Or he is able to hit on a higher resonant peak, that allows for such increase in power levels.
  I aim to find out...  even if it's the last thing I do.

How does he do that with just a touch from a 9V battery.