Floyd Sweet stated:

Quote

The Space Quanta Modulator: How it Works

First a time varying magnetic flux must be produced...

As the time varying flux of a period of 1/400 or 2.5 milliseconds sweeps over the stationary armature coils, voltage is induced defined by Faraday's law.

Magnet Conditioning is a Hoax, a Red Herring!

An Oscillatory 'Condition' is bought about by Current Flowing in the Power Coils!

Quote

The VTA "likes" to always see a minimum load of 25 watts.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Quote from: EMJunkie on November 29, 2015, 10:04:42 PM

To Everyone,

This Video is from the only person that really knew how the SQM/VTA really worked...

Good info. I like the way he oriented his coils. Thanks again for sharing.

I quote again from Floyd Sweet:

Quote

Electromagnetic in nature, responding to a polarizing force, also magnetic in nature, produce, by moving fundamental charges in a conductor, the moving charges polarizing effects that align the quanta energies into a coherent state. Once in this state, the moving charges initiating steady states of the electromagnetic field are opposed by opposing forces equal in magnitude and opposite in direction and a property of the space field. Thus, the moving charges on the electrons that excited the space field into being surrounding the electromagnet are not moving as a source of current flow, but lock the quanta in a coherent state of potential magnetic energy whose effects are evident and energy is there to be converted by unique hardware i.e. the Space Flux-Coupled Alternator. The other free electrons flowing through the winding and not needed to support the space flux are constituents of the current supporting the I2R losses in the copper wire.

All documents I have shared are all available on my website and have been for many years.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Of course Tom Bearden knew about the Opposing Fields! He does show on many occasions that this is the basis of all his theories:

Quote

"( 6 ) Investigative experiments to explore bucking EM force fields which neatly zero sum would have almost immediately revealed highly anomalous behaviour of materials and circuits. [Such simple investigations of zero-vector EM force field summation do not seem to appear in the Western literature at all, so far as can yet be established.]*** 
***with the single exception of the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which has finally been proved after 27 years of controversy, and Hooper's work which was obscurely published.
Something very much like that, together with quantum mechanical ideas, would have had to be applied to explain the operation of the Moray device. Note that every one of the suppositions above was available to any thorough Soviet search—and the Soviet scientists certainly made the search, more massively and thoroughly than has ever been done before or since. Since the evidence is overwhelming that the Soviet scientists developed electrogravitation and scalar EM weapons, it seems logical that their search succeeded along these lines or similarly." 
Ref: http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm

"Now to some specific issues:  Yes, my insight did keep growing.  At first I took the results of experiments such as by Hooper, with opposing "ordinary waves".  The effects of the core for the coils were a puzzle, but it seemed that sometimes the "opposing normal waves" would give some G effects, and more often they would not.  What I did not realize for some time was that the longitudinal wave can be regarded as a superposed wave/antiwave, via a single SWZ wavepair.  This agreed with Whittaker, and also now offered a sudden inspiration as to when we got the G effect and when not.   
We were dealing with four waves, not two, in the opposing ordinary waves.  We had two opposing normal waves and two opposing antiwaves, with the wave/antiwave coupling.  Two ordinary waves 180 degrees out of phase would certainly cancel (spatially) their amplitudes (as is well-known in RAM materials and structures) but would not cancel their energies.  The two antiwaves would do likewise, spatially.  The point then became, so what would happen in the time domain?  Here we got a shocker.  The two antiwaves would cancel each other's amplitude SPATIALLY, and would add energies.  But looking at the action (energy x time) aspect, their energies exist in negative time! 
Well, this meant that the antiwave ACTION would come out negative, and would then cancel the added positive wave ACTION because ? Ewt + ? Eaw(-t) = 0. Therefore the sum of the whole mess was zero!  Bummer!  We wound up with everything just vanishing, wherein all the action (angular momentum) seemed to vanish.  Well, this showed that the notion of simply having waves 180 degrees out of phase of itself would not give gravity effects.  So that's why mostly the Hooper approach didn't seem to do much.  But if one added nonlinear materials to the core, then one broke the linear cancellation. Once in a while, if one got it just right, one could get some spooky gravitational effects.  So that was a real clue." 
Ref: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/072796.htm

"I'd also like to point out the patents and work of Hooper. Hooper seems to be the only physicist who ever methodically investigated EM stresses, structuring of those stresses, and the gravitational implications of those stresses in the laboratory."
Ref: http://www.cheniere.org/misc/interview1991.htm

Tom Bearden's Scalar Wave is two Opposing Fields:

Tom Bearden - Definition of a Scalar Wave

Of course, this is part of one of the old Tom Bearden Audio Interviews:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Of course everyone knows already about John Bedini's G-Field Generator and his introduction of the Kromrey Converter:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org