Mr. Cadmon

The video in vimeo link you gave moves an iron core.

The Figuera patents are about not moving the core.

2. I am not talking about voltage. But wattage or Voltage and Current to be produced.

3. The only video of working rotary device described in the patent in this thread so far is one posted by me many months back. Even at very low frequency I could not get it to work. But it was able to swith on and switch off an incandescent lamp. It produced a lot of sparks even at 15 Hz and the carbon brushes were wasted quite fast.

Figuera himself says the Part G can be replaced by a switch.

4. The animation does not show the geometry of the device shown in 1908 nor 1902 patents. It shows a different geometry and is a simple animation.

My videos will show real cores producing current and voltage and also lighting lamps. Motionless iron cores. They will not be self runners though.

No more theroretical pep talks. Only videos of workung devices that are able to power lamps at the least. I can probably show you 8000 watts to be powered.

Regards

Ramaswami

OK Mr. Ramaswami.

I think you are missing the point in the video but I have no desire to argue with you or anyone else here. Life is too short.

To anyone who watches that video and only sees a moving core, please look more carefully at the setup and see everything else that is there. Is the flux balanced from one end to the other? You should be able to imagine how the flux will be arranged in the two setups. The strength of the magnets does not change. Their polarity is not alternating back and forth. The method of actuation is the same. The coil is the same.

So what must be the cause of one induced emf being higher than the other? The video relates to the Figuera generator. How?

CM

Quote from: Cadman on August 05, 2016, 02:19:50 PM
OK Mr. Ramaswami.

I think you are missing the point in the video but I have no desire to argue with you or anyone else here. Life is too short.

To anyone who watches that video and only sees a moving core, please look more carefully at the setup and see everything else that is there. Is the flux balanced from one end to the other? You should be able to imagine how the flux will be arranged in the two setups. The strength of the magnets does not change. Their polarity is not alternating back and forth. The method of actuation is the same. The coil is the same.

So what must be the cause of one induced emf being higher than the other? The video relates to the Figuera generator. How?

CM

Mr. Cadman..

Science is not about imaginig things. It is about making experiments observing experimental results and then moving step by step to increase your understanding and create a working prototype and then a saleable product.

What prevented Mr. Hanon or you or Mr. Marathonman or Mr. Doug from making working devices and posting pictures or videos online so whether there is any current or not could have been verified using a motionless core.

No animations no imaginations no assumptions please. Videos of devices that work in the presence of reputable witnesses please.

Regards

Ramaswami

Mr. Ramaswami,

Can't disagree with that. Except the imagining things part. If you have no imagination you will never conceive any working invention. And if a person is closed minded and not willing to entertain new ideas, well, that's their loss.

I never posted a video because the one I made with a N-S configuration wasn't any better than a regular generator. Like yours, it wasn't a self-runner. When I get the new one finished I'll be happy to post a video.

CM

Quote from: Cadman on August 05, 2016, 03:16:14 PM
Mr. Ramaswami,

Can't disagree with that. Except the imagining things part. If you have no imagination you will never conceive any working invention. And if a person is closed minded and not willing to entertain new ideas, well, that's their loss.

I never posted a video because the one I made with a N-S configuration wasn't any better than a regular generator. Like yours, it wasn't a self-runner. When I get the new one finished I'll be happy to post a video.

CM

Mr. Cadman..

Thank you for stating that you verified NSNSNS configuration and it is not better than a generator.


English is not my first language and I may be wrong.

Imaging means accepting things that do not exist to be true.

Creative thought process on the other hand is what you appear to mean by imagination. It involves coming up with ideas and then making calculations and projections and finally verifying it with experiments. If the results are different from the one projected either the idea is wrong or the projection is wrong or materials used are not suitable to implement the idea.

This is the investigative process of verifying everything and only when results obtained by one person can be replicated by another independent team the idea and the projections can be treated as valid.

If you are referring to this creative thought process and the investigative validation process as imagination I am not short of it.

Regards

Ramaswami