hanon,would it not be a sign of respect and honory behaviour like a real gentleman to indicate with whom you reached your actual knowledge level ?
You paid a little but how much did you received for this paid money as technical,by physics experiments and trial-error and success: result experience, value compensation
by Mister " NRamaswami "

        physics link by me:              http://www.rexresearch.com/hooper/hooper1.htm

Sincerely
              Oliver Christoph Waldhelm Lancza             (cz instead c-cedilhe)

Hanon: He visto tu video e incluso lo he resubido a YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGRzTFe5VCg). Mi pregunta es: has hecho experimentos con lo que has expuesto? Si lo hiciste, qué resultados obtuviste? Pregunto pues tu acercamiento me parece muy lógico.
Gracias.
==================================================
[IN BAD ENGLISH]
Hanon: I've seen your video and even I'd re-uploaded it to YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGRzTFe5VCg). Mi question is: did you make any experiments with your findings? If you did, what results did you get? I ask because your line of though seems very logical to me.
Thanks.

If you read the whole forum even some posts I did in 2013 you will see that from that date I defend the poles in repulsion design while the user you mentioned only used north-south polarity in his post and designs. I did not convince him of my point and he did not convince me of his proposal. If you really want to understand the patents you just have to read them tens of times as I did and analyze them in detail.

Less reading of strange and unrelated patents are you post here daily and more reading of Figuera patents, especially the one written in 1908. This is the key.

Good luck and keep on searching for more patents..

Hello hanon,
I have no problem with your explanation !


If you read the whole forum even some posts I did in 2013 you will see that from that date I defend the poles in repulsion design while the user you mentioned only used north-south polarity in his post and designs. I did not convince him of my point and he did not convince me of his proposal. If you really want to understand the patents you just have to read them tens of times as I did and analyze them in detail.Less reading of strange and unrelated patents are you post here daily and more reading of Figuera patents, especially the one written in 1908. This is the key.
Good luck and keep on searching for more patents..



" Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE"

Imagine this would be the drive from an vtol : how many transmission steps you want to have ?
         
               think 4Dimensional,but begin with a conventional car drive
               then think on land,under sea and on air


you are both right !     The Wheel : cw and ccw ; Audi Quatro transmission ? 4 X wheel-e-drives ?

                                    engine propulsion and transmission probably as automatic (solar-planet-gear)

                                   all terrain and spaces vehicle

Do you really think that I am in search ?


Sincerely
              OCWL

I regret that my name has been dragged in. To set records straight let me admit that it is Hanon who insisted on my continuing the research and overruling my objections sent me funds. $690 to be precise.

I have informed Hanon of all results and posted them here as well. Hanon has admitted to me that with pulsed DC input the NN poles produced zero output. The samevis the result with AC.

My efforts resulted in some people supporting me. Hanon wanted to know the identity of these friends and I have had no right to disclose identities of people who interact eith me based on trust in me. The others had not authorized me to disclose their identity to any one.  I refused to disclose.  Then Hanon felt offended and asked me to retun the funds. I have fully repaid all $690 received from Hanon in three installments. 

This is not to put Hanon in poor light. He wantedvto others but I had no authorisation and he felt offended and demanded his funds back.  I know his real identity and if others asked me to reveal it I would naturally have refused. I cannot commit a breach of trust.

Hanon has agreed that NN poles produce zero output volts with pulsed dc and they produce cop 0.30 to 0.40 when the rotary device as stated in Figuera patent is used. He has not disclosed to me as to what is the output if NS poles 

The team that did the project has dispersed and I am no longer interested in this.

Unfortunately here people come to abuse real researchers and post info that is at best a guesstimate. 

I have learned that with magnets experimental observation is the key and theories do not work and text books are programmed to limit your search for finding the truth. I did not go by text books. I progressed based on experimental observations and did many experiments.  I have learnt many but I have not shared all.

I have no interest in this any more. I have seen that people are not what they pretend to be.  I am very disappointed. 

Regards

Ramaswami