I just read above where Antimony said "but I didn't understand that the split tube should be between the two layers.".


When I made the image and wrote that there could be a coil or something inside and outside the split tube, I didn't know that this was meant to be anyway!


This is not a weak effect, but it is an aetheric one.  That is why it bends the rules with magnetizing Aluminium etc...


It would be enhanced by having nice solid reflective edges of the split tube as it acts as an oscillator I believe, but aetherically not electrically (Steel would have too much impedance).
You could use reflective aluminium tape or aluminium foil with the reflected side pointing inwards, to increase the "Q" of the oscillations within.

Here is a feedback mechanism, just connect a wire so it feeds in a circular manner into the tube, and point the other end so it picks up energy released from the gap.  In addition you can try and put a spark gap and capacitor between the 2 halves of the wire so that this does not fire every pulse, but only sometimes.  The aetheric energy acts as a high voltage, as such it might break through a capacitor if it's breakdown (to aether, which is difficult to know) is higher than the spark gap.


It works with or without the capacitor and spark gap.


It might also be that aetheric oscillations can also be created with sharp impulses from a primary as with a Multi Wave Oscillator.


note: Outer coil removed to show feedback wire connecting to split tube.

A further improvement.  Wind a non-inductive series bifilar coil, but have a few inductive turns in series.


Around that goes the split cylinder, preferably with one end bent to point inwards.


A wire pointing at the gap connects back to the cylinder.


Another coil is wound around the cylinder, though shown loose here for clarity.


Update: Here is another version with the pickup coil positioned to the side of the split tube, positioned such that the wire does not cut across the gap but that the horizontal part (top or bottom) of the pickup coil is inline with the split to make it easier for it to enter the coil.  In addition there is an inner and outer split cylinder with the ends bent and positioned as shown such that each of the 4 ends bunts against the side of another end, not easy to make but a real increase in intensity.

Is anyone interested in my discoveries with respect to this split core stuff?


Anyway I today I tried making this, first I tried the steel from a tin can, that was a real mess, the corrugations stops it from bending smoothly.  I bent the end of one side at 90 degrees as shown in the preceding images.  Even though not neat this worked very well!


I then had another go, I took the steel sheet that was a shield for an old CRT oscilloscope, this wasn't corrugated and it bent like a dream by comparison, I then made a second one as shown in the other image above with one nested inside the other, the power increased a LOT from the single layer version.


I then compared it to a plain split cylinder, there is no comparison.


Then I had an idea, to try and induce vibrations in a regular split tube from one with these bends, which are at least a little challenging especially with a thicker pipe/tube. , here it is in diagrammatic form FIG.1


I found that this worked well, and that you could even daisy chain them and increase the energy at each step. FIG. 2


The point is that allows for making of wire bent into these shapes and the energy from the gap can be directed to a cylinder which would be hard to bend into the requisite shape, you just need to induce the vibration in it.


I also found that if you feedback the energy of even a single one without the bend but through the circle, you can get a huge energy if done as shown in FIG.3!
Clearly my other means of creating feedback was VERY poor!


No kidding, this last method is very practical and makes a huge difference!  The feedback is exceptionally powerful!

Quote from: Grumage on February 04, 2017, 01:34:54 PM
Dear All.

Here is a link to the video that had Hoppy and I experiment further.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz0IPdPbHvA

Our findings were published on the Kapanadze main thread around May 2013.

Here's a link to my own interpretation of the above using a Royer oscillator to drive the primary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXIca35GeIY

Cheers Graham.

I think the reactive spark-gap in the first video might do more
than control the frequency.