Anyhow I do not buy the idea of the energy recycling in the toroid. If the energy were sent back to the toroid then the current would reverse and the system will suffer a polarity reversal, which is a capital sin in this device. Besides, the patents never mention any energy recycling mechanism.

You dont have to buy it. Regardless of how many ways it's been worded you cant destroy energy.

I meant in the sense MM explain, recycling kilowatts of energy with those thick wires. If you just mean to recycle those 36 watts in that case I could see it as probable.


I see you dont say a word about bulding details. Maybe I am wrong but I am doubting of all , after watching the recomendations that your prophet is saying in EF

Go to the link and look at 249 and 250. Then read the entire thing and consider there might be conditions that are not going to make everything universal that will only apply to certain set of conditions.

Follow the directions in the patent with the understanding not all conditions are created equal so not all conditional equations are for use as a universal equations but for a specific set of conditions. As you have yet been able separate part from part or where a particular condition might exist in one part but not in another part by design to perform a function your gonna be lost.

If you guys are talking about using an electromagnet for your resistance, I'm afraid the only thing you'll be recycling is your time. Figuera's resistance was non inductive. Excess inductive reactance will turn this into a giant transformer, not a generator.

Antjon

I can control anything I want with magnetic fields while maintaining separation from the output. That does not assume you will take the time to learn how it was done before the solid state rectifier was invented. The less you know the less you know what you gave up for a better way that was mostly better from the perspective of the beneficiary of that better way. More for them and less for you, less is more. They spend less and make more from you =the better way. It never defines who it was better for.