Quote from: Erfinder on February 20, 2017, 01:37:30 AM

Quote:


"The other terminal, as A, connects with a second brush K, bearing on the controller, so that the current which passes through and operates the motor is periodically interrupted."


"The circuit including the motor is of relatively high self-induction, and this property is imparted to it by coils of the motor, or, when these are not sufficient, by the addition of suitable choking-coils, so that at each break of the motor-circuit a current of high electro-motive force will be developed for charging the condenser, which may therefore be small and inexpensive."


End quote.




Yes Magluivin,


Twice! 


You people listen to everyone except the ones who have done the fucking work!  You want to progress, learn to recognize those who have a clue from the clueless!

So it says if the motor is not of sufficiently high inductance, additional choke coils can be added, then why would we need to study the motor? It seems that only the high inductance is needed? And if we dont need to fuss about the ozone production, why do we need the motor, with a fan?

Mags

.

Quote from: Erfinder on February 21, 2017, 02:37:37 PM

Phase relation is important, and not just in the "series" circuit.  Food for thought....  Reactive power is useless up until that moment when you realize it isn't.


Regards

Sometimes i wonder in what level our general awareness would be without your contribution..

Regards

@Partzman

Looking at your previous post #7951 and #8051 both good work but seems there is some problem there in the circuit if it is to replicate the ozone patent.

C3 should not be there at all. (If not as a pf value to help the mosfet then it should be removed).
L1 is the fan motor so should be a transformer with a secondary consuming some juice like a bulb or other or if the simulator can put in a fan motor that would be best.
V1 and M1 should be reversed. I guess M1 should be a PNP since it is passing the positive.
L2 to L3 seems OK.

Consider in the patent diagram (A) as positive and (B) as negative.

If there is a way to simulate that I would recommend to test it in two ways one without then one with M1 and C3 (if applicable). That will show any additional load with them in as a good comparison.

I have no experience in using such simulators so I may be off the mark but it seems to me the present circuit is not depicting the TOP process as it should.

Thanks for your work by the way.

wattsup

Hello,

well, there is no short cut!...so lets start from the begening..

tesla us patent 462, 418 method of conversion? maybe i can see it in all his later patent?!!
we need to replicate that patent, can you help?

Thanks and regards
luc2010