And i see another one that can't follow a patent. trying to improve the patent with unproven ideas is a waste of time and should be better spent understanding the real device not pipe dream ideas.
how may years are you people going to spend on the illusion of improving the Figuera device when you don't even understand the original in the first place.
it is like watching a group of dogs all chasing their tails at the same time banging their heads against each other in hope to catch their tail.

when will you people ever learn simplicity.

MM

I have been away from this forum for over a year because of bickering and trolls, but have pursued my interest in the Figuera generator. There are are 3 documents describing my PWM version of this noteworthy device. I hope you find them useful. Because the files are large, they will be posted separately.

I have available one extra main exciter PC board that is tested and functional. I am willing to give it to someone who is interested in pursuing this version of the generator, who has the funds to build the magnetic portion, and is willing to see it through to the end. My version of the magnetic portion will cost several thousand dollars, and a smaller one will not be much less. I would appreciate feedback and full disclosure about your efforts as well.

I also have two unpopulated PC boards for the exciter that need a few modifications to correct a design flaw and implement upgrades. These are available for the asking. I am willing to share the schematic and PC board drawings that are shown in the attachments, but they cannot be uploaded here as the file types are not supported.  If you find the schematic verbiage too small to read well, just expand the schematics by clicking on the upper left corner and dragging them.

A project of this nature will have errors. If you spot any, I would appreciate your bringing them to my attention. Once before, I presented the design spreadsheet and was told that the magnetic design was too big, but was not told why or given a way to correct it. I checked the math and found no errors or design flaws so I stayed with it. I don't mind being corrected, but if you see a flaw or a design error, please provide a solution for the error when replying. I don't need personal evaluations, but I do want to get this right, and will be most appreciative of your guidance and assistance. There are some very smart people on this forum and I ask for your input.

Best regards
Sam6

Here is the second file.

Here i the third file.

sam, I can only thank you for sharing all the info, quite remarkable thing and so few times seen around ..
how is magnetic circuit intended?

rgds,
mb