I am not an expert in this, and I would not consider anything that H20power says as "serious" if he ever would give you an answer either.

Simply put, nobody can answer you if bifilar coil is "better" because the science of causing increased gas production has never been proven or replicated.

What we dont really see is if Mr Petkov is getting exciting results or "just bubbles". Wich would make this Stan Meyers all over again, wich i dont want to repeat this loop.

Mr Pektov is doing something I dont quite understand, and he seems to think his waveforms are the same as stephen, when they are not.

I am not sure if Stephen Meyers uses a bifilar, pehaps he does, there is a double inductor but as drawn should not expect bifilar.

If its sending the right waveform then I dont see why it hurts tho.

The water will react to "a waveform", this is not a Kapanadze device where there is some important relationship for the coil otherwise water doesnt split.

Water is water, and we use, signals, capacitors, inductors, to tune the signal and gain efficiency.

Now I would need professionnal to analyze patent of Stephen Meyer.

And why do many topics go into oblivion many years ago.
For example, there was such a Tin man.
What did he achieve? Did he get his own OU ?

Using the keyword search, you can find a lot of topics on the decomposition of water. Only on this site. People worked, argued, lived it. And all is forgotten.

I'm thinking, if Meyer broke the covalent bonds of a water molecule by resonance,gas should be released throughout the cell, not on the electrode.If bubbles appear only on the electrode, this indicates a banal Faraday process.
I'm right?

there is the sites, for  what its worth 

open-source-energy.org

overunityresearch.com

RWGRESEARCH.com

Yeah pretty much right, many people mistakes HV bubbles with frequency for regular banal electrolysis.

How do distinguish?  BIG PRODUCTION. On the electrodes or near the electrodes, if the production is BIG, then its special electrolysis.

Lets say big production = 2x Faraday efficiency.

Quote from: Toolofcortex on December 21, 2019, 06:37:11 AM
there is the sites, for  what its worth 

open-source-energy.org

overunityresearch.com

RWGRESEARCH.com

Yeah pretty much right, many people mistakes HV bubbles with frequency for regular banal electrolysis.

How do distinguish?  BIG PRODUCTION. On the electrodes or near the electrodes, if the production is BIG, then its special electrolysis.

Lets say big production = 2x Faraday efficiency.

1) Faraday described a relationship between a moving charge and a conductor
His math did NOT include the atomic function of Maxwell's 3 equations


2) electrolysis is the function Stars!
Like the Sun that gives life and energy to our planet
the source of our "global warming problem", the answer to " infinite energy"
What exactly does a greenhouse gas "do"?


What temperature does Hydrogen burn at in open Air?
10,000+ degrees???


How does that make sense to you from a perspective of electrolysis?
Or Fuel cells?


Do it.
I have had a bench top weed eater Engine running an alternator
Powering it's up own electrolizer and still giving torque at the output shaft


The math shows overunity as does the real world situation.
It has little to do with Stanley Meyer's device.
He simply improved upon what was already happening.