Wesley, please stop confusing the members with
unrelated screenshots..
These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings and surely the input power and torques are then different...as long as the output power is integrated over several revolutions is always higher, the claims from the inventor are valid ..!
You always have to integrate the forces and torque to see the Average display values...

So what is your point...??
So please stop these confusing posting...
Thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

Quote from: hartiberlin on March 08, 2023, 10:38:32 AM
Wesley, please stop confusing the members with
unrelated screenshots..
These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings and surely the input power and torques are then different...
Regards, Stefan.

No problem.
I did the job nobody  else did equipment specs, model numbers  all data is in front of you.
IS THAT NON RELATED? ??
COMPERE THE NUMBERS  PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was not making any judgement.
AT ALL!!!!!!!
I posted that what is on the video!!!
It is not RPM that matters.
It is torque at given speed that differs vs HP.

Re:picture here « Reply #138
at the picture here on the right
at RPM 35 torque is 0.2188
HP is 0.0014
at the  the same picture on the left
at RPM 50 torque is 3.412 look here !!!!
HP is 0.0032

Re: picture here Reply #137
at the picture on the upper right
at RPM 36 torque is 0.1289
HP is 0.0008
at the  the same picture at the bottom
at RPM51 torque is 0.7311 look here and compare it with another blue  up  there  !!!!
HP is 0.0069

please compare the colors of the numbers green to green, orange to orange !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and blue to blue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

please look also at the connectors connection and cyan color line pointer   on the left hand side of the picture
_{look very carefully  on the very top of that connector little to the top right - is that something connected to it? I gave you device link and spec too just read it before you tell me to shut up.}
Re: Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity! « Reply #138 on: Today at 01:50:08 PM »
compare it  with the same device on the right side of that picture
do you see  something or you not? ?


who is confusing whom?

PLEASE ANSWER

Wesley

Hi!
After I learned Corbin Motor, I developed a possible structure.
See schematic

The position of Figure 1-1, carmine magenta represents the coil that starts to send power.
The coil current generates magnetic field lines, which strive to be the shortest,
Just pull the rotor and start rotating in the direction of the alignment of the lugs.


Figure 1-2 is located, yellow represents the de-energized coil.
At this position, the current in the coil has = 0, and there are no magnetic field lines.
The magnetic force when the teeth are aligned has disappeared
The rotor continues to rotate by inertia without resistance.


Position sensor according to the circuit,
And over and over again, energizing and powering the coil.
The rotor is constantly rotating.

It seems that Corbin's lever amplification moment is not used here.
Can you still OU?


Please note: The coil here, after the power is applied,
Power off at one angle before the teeth are aligned.
The coil releases magnetic energy with a back EMF.
The current continues until the teeth are aligned, and the current = 0.

This allows the coil to consume very little energy.
The rotational moment of the rotor does not decrease.

Is this OU?

Please advise.


Figure 2 is the side view The display structure is very simple.

Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the rotor and stator.

Thank you!

Quote from: hartiberlin on March 08, 2023, 10:38:32 AM
...
These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings and surely the input power and torques are then different...as long as the output power is integrated over several revolutions is always higher, the claims from the inventor are valid ..!
You always have to integrate the forces and torque to see the Average display values.
...
Regards, Stefan.

Hi Stefan,

You say "These Input settings were taken at different RPM settings".
I'm not sure. If you're referring to the side by side display readings, those are instantaneous data on the input shaft from the torque sensor at 2:19 and 3:38 minutes. They are not necessarily different RPM settings. The speed and torque varies rapidly due to cogging as seen on the strip charts on other video. I find it quite interesting this particular data.

At 2:19                      At 3:38                       Average
RPM -50                   RPM -35.                    RPM -42.5
ft.lb. +0.3412           ft.lb. -0.2189             ft.lb. +0.0612
Deg -123206            Deg -127904
HP   -0.0032             HP   +0.0014             HP    -0.0009

Simple averages do not yield correct power. The calculated HP using +0.0612ft.lb. & -42.5RPM = -0.00049HP. So integration is needed.

Also I wonder if negative torque is actually transmitted to the motor.  If so, the PWM controller may not tolerate it. But the polar moment of inertia of the shaft, gears, and armature may dampen it sufficiently.

Also I wonder the effects of one-way bearings that SL has mentioned.

The more we pick apart (I mean analyze) the apparatus, the more likely we are to discover its true operation.

In reading over the literature from the Futek torque sensor reminds me of their sensitivity to alignment and calibration. I've never used two in line like this and saw no other such reference to do so. Is there anything peculiar about it? And I'd like to see static torque calibration. This was always done when using these sensors with torque arms and precision weights.

And then, as mentioned previously, proof of pudding, loop it.

Regards,
bi

..