Quote from: Pirate88179 on December 21, 2007, 09:31:27 PM

@ Jeanna:

Great work out there!!!  Thanks for the info on Beaty.  I will look that up and read.  I love to read. I don't think messing with powdered graphite or carbon is going to work, and if it does it will not work as well as the isopressed and sintered rods.  The binder, in this case, some sort of conductive glue, will make up a certain percent of the mixture and thereby weaken the properties.  Of course, I never tried it and maybe it won't be the same as a condensed rod of the same size but still might be more than a carpenter's pencil.  Who knows?  Hey, stupid question here.  I have seen where I can buy, pretty cheap, carbon/graphite powder by the pound.  what if someone were to dig a hole and say fill it almost up with this powder, no glue, just the powder.  Could one stick electrode pick-ups into the pile and take the volts off of that?  I guess the rain would raise hell with it after a while but, if it's cheap.....?  Just a thought.

G'day Bill,

How about drilling a hole in a lump of coal, insert a wire into it (insulated and stripped where it enters the coal to avoid galvanic action) and burying that. It would be cheap and it might just work 

Hans

To connect graphite rods electrically it is best to use silver wire or silver coated wire, cause it will not give any big difference voltage due to low dissimular metals...
you could also use a stainless steel screw screwed into the graphite, but the ss screw will be consumed after a while, cause graphite is etching the stainless steel away...

Quote from: Artic_Knight on December 22, 2007, 10:38:36 AM
on normal science terms the greater the resistance the less the voltage however i have seen a couple free energy devices that claim raising the resistance or load increases their devices ability to increas its output to match... perhaps something twisted like that may be occuring but i dont see why it would work like that.

That is sort of what I am looking to find

I am guessing that it is possible because this earth is a giant motor, with the metal magnet inside a magnetic field. The magnetic field looks just like the shavings around a dipole magnet on a table. OK so, the part that all the scientists (not all) seem to ignore is that this magnet is careering through space. So, this magnet with its charge (from the sun )  is moving and spinning.  Since motors can be turned into generators I am interested in finding a way to do this.

The biggest problem here is not if we can get this power (lightning rods  ), but how to make it small enough that we survive getting this power.

I like this earth battery cuz it seems a way to get a confined amount of electricity in an orderly and useful way.

One day in that electronics class, I realized that you can't get useful power without a resistor. Too much and it stops everything, but without it you just get a blast of voltage and SINCE it expressed itself as all voltage there were no amps. Also a wire is a resistor. The thinner the wire the greater the resistance. Bills device shows that we are indeed getting amps as well as volts

My electronics teacher never allowed me to use the amp meter. He said it was too confounded by the workings of the meter itself. It is probably there for electricians testing wall plugs etc.


 

Quotewhen your measuring resistance from one pole to the next your measuring as if your passing a voltage from one through the ground to the other, in this battery if im not mistaken we need 2 poles only because the voltage has to have a return path (but does not need to reach the other pole) because the voltage from the return path does not need to reach the collecter there is no increase in resistance and thus as bill says he has experienced or was it joe? the farther the poles are from each other the greater the electrical potential, but the greater the resistance as well! however remember voltage has to have an in and an out, with that considered the ground provides the current but when it returns to ground it does not return to the other pole (unless a chemical reaction is occuring)   

or maybe unless there is another pole and something that draws the power away, thus "directing" this charge to the other pole. (the meter may be just the draw that is needed to direct it to the pole.)

Or, maybe it is because there is more resistance that there is more voltage when the poles are farther apart??

Quote
my question is has someone tried to take a car battery or other 12 volt high power battery and "charge" their earth battery? it only needs a second or two to activate or in my case with the sand batteries increase the voltage by a rediculas 200% ! from .04 volt to .76!

Does it stay there? If you charge an area of earth through 2 poles does it stay charged?

jeanna

G'day all,

Just found this one, http://www.mondovista.com/meyers/ really weird but reminiscent of Stubblefield in a way, except is is not buried in the ground.

Have fun

Hans von Lieven

PS. Still struggling with Helmholtz and Pamenides that is why my promised next essay is so long in coming. Still working on it though.

hansvonlieven, "Just found this one, http://www.mondovista.com/meyers/ really weird but reminiscent of Stubblefield in a way, except is is not buried in the ground."



Absorber,  hmmmm, LOL  What does my theory consist of? What did my design consist of?

His design didn't even need to attract any certain frequency, it seemed to have worked off all frenquencies. hmmm It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.