ah yes the wants and the needs lol


if you think you need backtorque go ahead and use it 


i dont need it 


just imagine that generator i just designed spinning at 30 000 from a 15 amp input at 110 vac

hummmmm

oh yea running on a pressure washer

ist

if you all want to go further than get rid of all moveing parts lol

~~To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition~~

just incase some of you have not figured this out yet

how many of thease units i just showed could be powered from this picture below  and how much power will come from 1 coil?!?!?!


hey you all wanted to know more about my GUNS lol!!!!

Quote from: OilBarren on February 27, 2008, 06:37:56 AM
1st is Thanes magnetic coupling to the induction motor
2nd is the 2 cores between the third core wich is shorted
3rd is the hpg's

all with verry low backtorque

WILLIAM YOU ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION:

THE GENERATOR COUNTER-TORQUE WHEN MAGNETICALLY COUPLED TO THE INDUCTION MOTOR IS CONVERTED INTO COMPLIMENTARY-TORQUE WHICH HAS THE EFFECT OF ACCELERATING THE MOTOR UNDER LOAD RATHER THAN DECELERATING IT.

IS THAT CLEAR?
YOU ACTUALLY WANT HIGH BACK/COUNTER TORQUE.
SAY AMEN OR SOMETHING PLEASE.

Thane

thane

you are correct  in your set up backtorque is required  for proper operation 

ist

ist, I'm seldom this rude, but isn't there some traffic you could go play in?

Oh and since you seemingly didn't get it, I thought your first drawing looked incomprehensible and could have been of a space ship, but it needed guns.

Yes, everyone here knows of how to remove the slight performance losses caused by magnetic cogging, we are aware of Bill Muller.

And a design such as you show might work but the world will never know since no one will ever build it, least of all you, but please prove me wrong.

You are being a distraction but you aren't doing anything useful, you aren't replicating the effect or trying to understand it, you aren't giving sage advice to Thane and you aren't challenging the validity of Thanes effect.

Quote from: aether22 on February 27, 2008, 06:27:26 AM
The level of desperation, or (and?) stupidity from these people is nothing short of astounding.
Do these people believe their own excuses? Next time you hear such a claim please ask the person 'how honest do you feel tight now in giving that answer? Do you feel that is an intellectually honest answer?'

It's impressive that you still bother with these people at all to find the odd gem you have.

IT'S NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS - THE PROBLEM IS OFTEN VERY TECHNICALLY COMPETENT AND SINCERE PEOPLE TRYING TO APPLY CURRENT LEVELS OF UNDERSTANDING (WHICH ARE NOT ADEQUATE) TO THE NEW PHENOMENON(S).

AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS THREAD - IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME AND ENERGY - MOST PEOPLE SIMPLY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH JUICE LEFT TO APPLY THEMSELVES AT THE END OF THE DAY.

BTW - LUC WAS IN THE LAB TODAY WORKING ON HOOKING UP SOME LIGHT BULBS FOR THOSE OUT THERE WHO "WANT TO SEE THE LIGHT" SO TO SPEAK.

PERHAPS LUC CAN ELABORATE - IN HIS OWN WORDS - WHAT OCCURED WHEN THE LIGHT BULB WAS CONNECTED?

Thane

Hi Thane,

Thanks for not leaving the board, love your new nickname by the way! 

bitbeam