[/quote]

Indeed that may be why I have failed to get results, I may need to get a Ryobi.[/quote]

I THINK THEY MAKE THEM JUST UP THE STREET FROM YOU IN CHINA?

Thane

Thane,

Ah ... your addition of the "HV COIL CAPACITANCE ..." is an "aether idea."               


RCH

Quote from: markzpeiverson on May 08, 2008, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: OUman on May 08, 2008, 07:08:01 PM

Quote from: markzpeiverson on May 08, 2008, 06:12:49 PM

Quote from: OUman on May 08, 2008, 08:11:55 AM

He makes a bold statement, right at the outset: that "Einstein's theory is of no practical use in technology". If he is so ignorant as to be unaware of the vast number of applications of relativity in actual daily use (already in 1998 of course) then one must certainly question his authority to declare that "there HAS to be an aether". Perhaps he also believes that the world is flat or that the sun orbits the earth?

Can't think of any practical, daily applications...

So you haven't come across nuclear power yet then?

Of course, the equivalence of mass and energy (E=mc^2)... like, DUH! 

Okay, that's ONE element of RT that has produced something of practical use, but its a FAR CRY from, to quote you, "...a vast number of applications...".  If you're a scientist, shame on you!  A true scientist is VERY careful about throwing around adjectives like that...

-Mark

Nice of you to admit to that one little detail but it goes much further, Mark. It really is a vast number of everyday applications. You could not build most of today's integrated circuits without knowledge of quantum mechanics. You would not have a computer, we could not be having this conversation...

Quote from: i_ron on May 08, 2008, 07:23:12 PM

I take your pathetic posts as a cry for help. I hope I can help you open your eyes and come into the light, you will be welcomed.

Ron

Thanks for the offer, Ron, but I'll take a raincheck on that. If you or anyone here manages to create just one result that actually does demonstrates a departure from conventional theory, that is not obscured by wilful experimental error, and that has been replicated by someone else independently, then I'll get back to you. Does that seem reasonable?

Quote from: OUman on May 08, 2008, 10:17:21 PM

Quote from: markzpeiverson on May 08, 2008, 08:06:24 PM

Quote from: OUman on May 08, 2008, 07:08:01 PM

Quote from: markzpeiverson on May 08, 2008, 06:12:49 PM

Quote from: OUman on May 08, 2008, 08:11:55 AM

He makes a bold statement, right at the outset: that "Einstein's theory is of no practical use in technology". If he is so ignorant as to be unaware of the vast number of applications of relativity in actual daily use (already in 1998 of course) then one must certainly question his authority to declare that "there HAS to be an aether". Perhaps he also believes that the world is flat or that the sun orbits the earth?

Can't think of any practical, daily applications...

So you haven't come across nuclear power yet then?

Of course, the equivalence of mass and energy (E=mc^2)... like, DUH! 

Okay, that's ONE element of RT that has produced something of practical use, but its a FAR CRY from, to quote you, "...a vast number of applications...".  If you're a scientist, shame on you!  A true scientist is VERY careful about throwing around adjectives like that...

-Mark

Nice of you to admit to that one little detail but it goes much further, Mark. It really is a vast number of everyday applications. You could not build most of today's integrated circuits without knowledge of quantum mechanics. You would not have a computer, we could not be having this conversation...

Who's gonna be the first to say it? I thought your argument was about Relativity, mainly SR.
But Quantum mechanics is a totally different animal, one Einstein did not believe in, one which contradicts SR.