Resonating homopolar generator

[zapnic]

tesla stuff for notes for unipolar
the field would be dragged in the same direction with a torque, which, up to a certain point, would go on increasing with the speed of rotation, then fall off, and, passing through zero, finally become negative; that is, the field would begin to rotate in opposite direction to the disc
thats weird but i have see in youtube

okey its remaing magnetfied or remanent
and i have read somewhere "somepoint remaing magnetfield is creating large Barkhausen jump's"
nnn mmmmm
weird....

[BEP]

@zapnic

Please post a link to the youtube vid you mentioned. I've seen many and none fit my description. 
The fact that rotation reverses at a point I've seen and duplicated but it was rotation of the charge not the magnetic. At least the best I could tell.

[giantkiller]

@TinselKoala

I appreciate the links and info. Thanks. But try rotating a magnet around it's N/S axis with the target of generating a current in a disc or wire.... It won't work. Faraday had some explanations of why rotating the magnet instead of the disc would not generate potential.

You can spin a magnet so the positions of the poles alternate or move. This is used to generate potential or to make a motor shaft turn.

You can't rotate a magnetic field no matter what you do to the magnets. You will only spin the magnet. The field and the flux are not part of the magnet and are not attached to it no more than light is attached to a lens.

This is why you can make a whopper of a homopolar generator by sandwiching a copper disc between two magnets with the magnets attached so they must turn with the disc. Spin the magnets and the disc all together on the same shaft. You will build a potential from the shaft to the edge of the disc and have only one moving part (less all the brushes needed  ) The potential is built because the magnetic field remains fixed even though the magnets are spining.

I've built a few of them. Even though I know it is absolutely impossible to rotate a magnetic field, as described, I'm not dumb enough to believe I know it all. So if it can be done I would dearly love to see it and perform that feat myself.
That is 'rotating a magnetic field and/or flux around it's N/S axis' as opposed to an electric field, flux or plasma.

Sorry.... too wordy. No offense meant at all. You see, for me, hearing someone say they will rotate a magnetic field is like listening to someone drag their front teeth across a chalkboard.......  EEEK!

I left the whole quote in place because it is all very valuable and because it is the Searl configuration. But the most important next step is this one:

This is why you can make a whopper of a homopolar generator by sandwiching a copper disc between two magnets with the magnets attached so they must turn with the disc. Spin the magnets and the disc all together on the same shaft. You will build a potential from the shaft to the edge of the disc and have only one moving part (less all the brushes needed  ) The potential is built because the magnetic field remains fixed even though the magnets are spinning.

The magnets traveling around the ring look the same as spinning with the disk. The copper is cut with new flux position at each new postion.
Even tho the Earth spins the attraction is the same and the light falls on a new postion every new moment. We see that a thermal gradient in succession.
Hector and Dan Combine, in the RE_OU-v6.pdf mentions this thermal difference also.

--giantkiller. The devices are all very close not because of the process we apply but because of the action & effect we attain.