New magnetic-gravity motor chasing its tail from Tom

[johnny874]

  airstriker,
nothing personal but I think anything that requires someone to stop and think is not wanted.
I made a video that shows that lead can control magnetic repulsion but decided not to upload it.
With all the electrical wizards in here that go by h/mv and not f = ma already would know that.

[ramset]

Johny
Sometimes when you post you sound like a really nice guy!
And at other times........you sound pretty cranky.

Do you have an "Evil Twin",or is it a morning cup of coffee thing?

I suppose a lot of guys have tried Lead as a shield over the years ?

If lead works as an ""effective"" magnetic shield I'm gonna let the air out of "TK's" tires!!

How's about a morning movie ?

Where all in this together Johny!
Thx
Chet

[johnny874]

  Chet,
if you read the first 2 posts other people made when I posted my idea, what did I do wrong ? I was even willing to donate the patent rights.
Right, I don't have a place to build. If so, I would be building it.
I may be able to in a month or two.
I think some don't thinks it takes much to get the details understood well enough to be workable.
it can be stressful and then the poor attitudes from people who don't really seem to understand that tbis is the gravity section of the forum.
I don't go into other parts of the forum because I have spent much time studying how leverage can be used to convert gravity into mechanical energy.
It might also be that with engineering, you can only do what it allows. I've noticed a lot of people aren't comfortable having to pursue an idea differently. I guess most people like to stay with what they are familiar with.

[TinselKoala]

What I've noticed is that many people don't want to do the homework required fully to understand their systems and would rather work on things that they believe, without justification, to be true.

The textbook I recommended to you in another thread is a basic mechanical engineering textbook, usually covering two semesters of coursework at the freshman or sophomore college level. Calculus is a prerequisite. The book is full of example systems, sample problems, and solved problems. Most people with an engineering background... like me... have struggled through this two semester course in statics and dynamics and have passed it and have proceeded on to more particular and detailed study of individual systems.

And that is why they don't think your system, or any Besseler system, or Milkovic's pendulum system, will work as an overunity device: it is because they actually DO have a deeper understanding of these topics than someone who has not had that particular educational experience. And that is also why lots of people here don't want anything to do with  real engineering math.... because it contradicts their hazy and uneducated assumptions about the way the world works.

The next time you drive a car over a bridge.... thank Beer and Johnston when you arrive safely at your destination, because the engineers that designed the bridge and that designed your car... also completed that coursework, and believed what they learned there.

Now.... carry on, build and test, do the math (tm RA).

--TK

[johnny874]

  why are you even here tk ?
You don't the first thing about Bessler's work.
And to quote Albert Einstein, he thought someone would be ingenious enough to do it.
And schools routinely have students buy the latest text book so it will be up to date.
Wnen was yours written, in 1920 or even 1940 when they thought the sound barrier couldn't be broken ? heck, even powered flight was considered impossible just as life requires both sun light and oxygen.
check your text book. of course, everyone knows life exists without oxygen and without sun light. I gues it's a goox thing publishers update text books.
Wny am I thinking TROLL right now ?