FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3080659.ece/BINARY/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf

THANK YOU GROUNDLOOP.

R

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ok Guys,

Here's a direct copy from that paper.  Could some kind soul please give a link to that patent?  Or - if you know this - does that patent publication specify the required catalyst?  If the patent is published then it's - presumably - waiting for prior art claims.  And if it were registered then - presumably it would have been mentioned. 

Also.  What date was it published.  I'd love to see how that date compares to Piantelli's publication. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

A process (international patent publication N. WO 2009/125444 A1)
capable of producing large amounts of energy by a nuclear fusion process
between nickel and hydrogen, occurring below 1000 K, is described. Ex-
perimental values of the ratios between output and input energies obtained
in a certain number of experiments are reported. The occurrence of the
e§ect is justiÖed on the basis of existing experimental and theoretical re-
sults. Measurements performed during the experiments allow to exclude
neutron and gamma rays emissions.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ok Guys,  Off the cuff - here's my take.

Rossi DOES HAVE A CATALYST.  It's mentioned in his paper and, presumably it's mentioned in the patent. That catalyst is simply the required pre heating of the cell to get to an optimised level to initiate the process.  Maybe?  I see ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION of any pre-heating requirement in Piantelli's paper.  I have no idea if Cellani used this.  But Cellani never published - to the best of my knowledge.  He was working behind closed doors using - as Rossi pointed out to us all - the tax payers money for his research.   

If this is indeed covered in Rossi's patent - then he's absolutely SAFE.  Provided only that it's ALWAYS required.  My take that is that it IS required to ensure the levels of wattage that he manages.  So.  If this is right - then why is he so reluctant to point this out?  Why the secrecy related to his catalyst?  I'm reasonably certain that he cannot claim any novelty in his patent simply by using hydrogen and nickel.  We all know that Focardi and others were working on precisely this mix - from some years back.  And Tumi's link shows us that there were some pretty comprehensive options covered in that document of Piantelli's.  Hard to find any element outside the range of options that he included in that list.  lol  Frankly I think that any attempt at patenting LENR is pretty well prevented from that publication.

All very puzzling.  Frankly I think that Rossi would do himself a great favour in letting us all know what that secret is.  It's painful going through this guessing game.  And what the hell.  No-one's likely to be able to patent it outside of Rossi.  It's very evident that he found the 'catalyst' first.  Perhaps the delays are simply to ensure that we don't start our own 'home grown' versions of this.  Maybe - like Tumi suggested - it really is that easy. 

So guys.  We've got a hotbed of some really good talent here.  Let's see if we can do some replications.  It will only add to the general knowledge.  And who knows?  Maybe there are other ways of skinning this 'e-cat'?  Always a good thing to have a bit of competition.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

Sorry I've been monopolising posts here.  I'll lay off after this one.

[Groundloop]

.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Groundloop - you're an angel.  Thank you very, very much.  Just think - you'll be able to replace all those wood-burning stoves!  You need an E-cat in your basement. 

   

Well guys.  Here's the thing.  There's a plethora of TRANSMUTED ELEMENTS at the end of that process! None of them apparently in an unstable isotopic form.  Lighter elements include but are not limited to COPPER, ZINC, CHLORINE, POTASSIUM, CALCIUM??  And that - MOST CERTAINLY - is COLD FUSION.  The ONLY THING that is DIFFERENT that is mentioned in that patent, that I can see - is that the hydrogen is injected under varying pressures 'pulsed' or 'continuous' - presumably, to generate varying levels of reaction - and that the nickel powder is of a specific size and that it also comprises the required unstable 62 isotope.  That last bit is the surprise.

All of which means this. 

The catalyst is, indeed, the heating of the material in the core
The preferred hydride needs to be in an unstable isotopic form
Not sure how necessary is the use of Nickel-62.  He mentions that it's used, simply because it's readily available
The hydrogen requires a pulsed and/or continuous injection
Required shielding is nominal and mostly lead (Not sure of boron?  Can anyone advise?  Presumably just an efficient shield?)
Emissions - if any - are contained by those materials and containment is required for the efficacy of the process

Points at which this is novel include all of the above - together with the level of efficiency claimed.  And that CANNOT BE ARGUED as NO-ONE HAS EVEN GOT CLOSE TO ROSSI'S NUMBERS.  Which, in my book, means that that his patent should SURELY be granted? 

So.  If there are ANY other required catalysts and IF they're not included in this patent - then they're up for grabs.  Rossi would know this.  Therefore I'll put money on it that there are none.  That whole catalyst thing is a red herring.  I'm going to try and fish out where it was first mentioned.  I can't believe that Rossi would have perpetrated a 'lie'.  It's actually ENTIRELY out of character.  Unless, of course, he was simply referring to that heat.  Which means that he has been telling us about it all along.

All of which means that nickel is likely to be our NEW GOLD.  I'd recommend a buy.  lol

Please let me know if I've missed anything salient.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary


edited the spelling