another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Cloxxki]

I get lost within a few words, words start to dance in front of my eyes.


Your last post to me again explained a capacitor. A best, a situation where one person eating patato chips (very low input) is irritating the entire opera house, but won't get them to make noise (= work) or leave their seats (=work). You can measure the 1000 highly irritated people and get proof of their collective "negative energy", but it only exists inside that place and moment. You can't use their frustration to get to a person out on the street.



Remove the OU claims and the technology might be interesting to explain currently unknown laws and particles. With the OU claim attached though, I will call it nonsence unless attempted to loop.

Like sitting by the river, flowing violently. You stick in your hand and the river pulls. Wow, free energy! Yet totally useless. It's drained your body's energy soms by cooling you hand, and you were not to put the force to use. Stick in a waterwheel plus generator and you're in business.
Don't set the standards so low for yourself. If you observe the river, don't just measure it, tap into it. If you find the river stops flowing when you stick in the waterwheel, that gives you hints as to how that river works.


Is the chaotic heat really a byproduct or an intermediate phase of a repeating process? It is even conventional heat?


This may come across as disrespectful, but if you can't use a battery to charge the other one up and do some useful work, you've at best invented a new way to drain a battery. OU is alll about newly charged batteries, and better: work done. Water needs to be heated, on demand. Scalable. Weight need to be lifted. Not temporarily, but definitely. No counter-action.

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

@ Rosemary, sorry your heat is produced by the inductor !?  They have a core ? I hope you have not confounded with the hysteresis losses of a core ?

You have spoken that the circuit material DEPLETE, but problem any depleting source = Conventional energy transformation not FE...

After reading your text look like a nuclear reaction, maybe a new type but not FE...

I would like to know what is degrading ? The core, the wire, the MOSFET ?
Degrading, depleting is not good at all, I hope I have misunderstood your response...


SRM.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Remove the OU claims and the technology might be interesting to explain currently unknown laws and particles. With the OU claim attached though, I will call it nonsence unless attempted to loop.

Well.  Cloxxki.  That's your prerogative to make of it what you will.  You're still insisting we loop this.  I assure you we can't.  We are NOT creating energy.  We're simply transferring it.   

Like sitting by the river, flowing violently. You stick in your hand and the river pulls. Wow, free energy! Yet totally useless. It's drained your body's energy soms by cooling you hand, and you were not to put the force to use. Stick in a waterwheel plus generator and you're in business.
Don't set the standards so low for yourself. If you observe the river, don't just measure it, tap into it. If you find the river stops flowing when you stick in the waterwheel, that gives you hints as to how that river works.

Low standards?  Golly.  That's rough.  I thought our standards of experimentation are rather high. And there's surely some value in resolving a lot questions related to our standard model?  In any event.  I get it you're not into theory. 

Is the chaotic heat really a byproduct or an intermediate phase of a repeating process? It is even conventional heat?

Just read that paper Cloxxki.  I think you may yet get a better sense of it.  And if English isn't your home tongue - then google can translate.  Not sure how well.

Thanks any way
Rosemary

This may come across as disrespectful, but if you can't use a battery to charge the other one up and do some useful work, you've at best invented a new way to drain a battery. OU is alll about newly charged batteries, and better: work done. Water needs to be heated, on demand. Scalable. Weight need to be lifted. Not temporarily, but definitely. No counter-action.

I missed this.  HOW DO WE DRAIN THAT BATTERY?  Not only have we NOT measured any loss of voltage over an entire year of continual use -  but our measurements show a zero discharge.  It's not disrespectful.  It's simply not scientific.  You're like so many others.  You've made up your mind about the evidence without evaluating that evidence.  How are we to progress anything at all when standard measurements are ignored? 

Again
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary, sorry your heat is produced by the inductor !?  They have a core ? I hope you have not confounded with the hysteresis losses of a core ?

We use an element that has a certain inductance in it's material.  We do NOT use any kind of standard transformer.

You have spoken that the circuit material DEPLETE, but problem any depleting source = Conventional energy transformation not FE...

No Schubert.  The degradation is to the bound state of the resistor material.  Over time.  For instance the filament in a light would break.  Too much energy and the resistor can catch fire.  Golly.  PLEASE read that paper.  It's all there.  I shouldn't have tried to answer Cloxxki.

After reading your text look like a nuclear reaction, maybe a new type but not FE

Indeed it's not FREE ENERGY.  I have NEVER subscribed to free energy.  In my humble opinion - there's no such thing. 

I would like to know what is degrading ? The core, the wire, the MOSFET ?

All I'm pointing to is that there are losses.  Much less than the depletion of a battery.  But still there are losses.  It is NEVER FREE ENERGY.

Degrading, depleting is not good at all, I hope I have misunderstood your response...

LOL.  NO.  You've only made it more extreme than I intended.

Take care Schubert.  And PLEASE.  Read that 2nd paper.  Surely it's understandable?   I've had REALLY prestigious academics commend it for it's CLARITY.  Surely it's not entirely incomprehensible to you guys?

Kindest again,
Rosemary

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

OK I will read this, can you give me a link it's on forum DDL section ?

Regards SRM.