another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

Doesn't anyone else but me have a calculator and a freshman EE textbook?

[TinselKoala]

 

[PhiChaser]

Ouch... Yeah, you have to count the time factor in there Rosemary.
You mentioned 72k volts or something like that number somewhere else in this thread and I thought that one sounded funny too. Discharged nearly instantaneously or unaccounted for or something... This thread is too long already to go digging for quotes. Sorry Rose, these guys have some seriously convincing arguments that you are WRONG about how you measure your circuit and your interpretation of the data. You just made simple math errors and touted them as empirical evidence. It becomes more difficult to take your mystery 'oscillations' seriously. I say they are feedback from looping Q1 and Q2 but I don't know CRAP compared to poynt99 and TK and Gyula. Hell, I didn't even understand half of what Gyula said the first time I read it!
ALL of them have more knowledge about electronics than you do Rose (and WAAAAY more than me). Maybe you're onto something, who knows? I say this again: I see a mobius loop in there. I think that is the key to finding the elusive OU, but again, who knows?
Boiling a couple cups of water doesn't take tens of millions of joules or six twelve volt batteries. Even I know that... 
Is this really how you have been making your POWER calculations?!? Holy crap...
(Looks around for flying towels...)

Regards,
Derrick

[TinselKoala]

That last bit of arrogant mathematical nonsense from Rosemary should be the definitive nail in the coffin of the Ainslie claims. It's all there for anyone to see.  What do you think, Stefan? What do you think, Professor Jones? You are dealing with someone who not only makes up her own definitions of terms, but who cannot compute and WILL NOT LEARN to compute fundamental circuit parameters correctly.  Why bother to design tests, when she doesn't even understand power and energy calculations, much less subtle factors like instrument ground loops and integration of spiky waveforms?

[poynt99]

And, Poynty Point.  I put it to you that IF that is a definitive test - then there should be absolutely NO difficulties in finding the academics to endorse it.  I suspect that you'll have difficulties - notwithstanding.  And then you'll begin to appreciate why it is that I have difficulty in engaging ANY ACADEMICS AT ALL to go ON RECORD - about any part of these our claims.

Always and ever,
Rosie Posie

TO HELL WITH THE ACADEMICS ROSEMARY. THAT'S A RUSE. STOP PISSING AROUND PLAYING SILLY BUGGER; GET OFF YOUR DAMN ASS, AND JUST DO THE DAMN TEST!