another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Now.  You tell me why the only thing more unpopular than me is this technology.  Because I cannot understand it.  Poynty has gone to great lengths to assure all and sundry that it's based on measurement error.  So has Harti.  Yet neither of them are able to show where this error is.  Or where they've defined the source of the error I am able to assure them that this has been dealt with in our paper.  They both know what's in those papers because they both have copies.  And ALL our detractors actively discourage anyone at all from trying this themselves.  And when those such as Groundloop actually start exploring aspects of this - then Poynty rather insultingly cuts in to insist that his own circuit variant be tested.  When Schubert tries to simulate it Poynty does NOTHING to advise him on the required transistor positions.  When genuine interest is getting sparked then EvolvingApe goes to some considerable trouble to discourage ANY INVESTIGATION AT ALL.

I cannot explain this Flux It.  But here's the thing.  Both Poynty and Professor Jones are on record.  They'll give a prize for proof of over unity.  So.  On that basis we can 'legally' demand an engagement.  And guess what?  No-one's engaging.  And this  - as you pointed out -  is NOT rocket science.  I can prove this by demonstrating the circuit on a one to one.  Or I can prove it on a public demonstration.  In the latter case - then I would require academic approval that the test would be definitive.  Because it will cost me in time and money to organise the required controls and the required supervision.  I KNOW they'll find reason to dismiss this notwithstanding.  But I also KNOW that academics are more intellectually honest.  They WON'T.

Dear God.  What more can I do?  Do the 555 test to waste more time.  Argue grounding issues that have been comprehensively addressed.  Argue small variations due to our shunt's inductance - when this is so marginal as to be ridiculous.   We're not talking fractions of a watt.  We're dissipating in excess of 120 watts. 

So.  Again.  You tell me what's going on.  Because I really do not know.  I only speak with some considerable authority - and I need only point to the many threads on this technology and its variations - to show you all that there seems to be some overriding need to discredit me - or the technology or BOTH.  And from your reaction to Ape's post - then CLEARLY - their efforts are more effective than even I realised.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

[poynt99]

.  And not only this but the circuit is even simpler to simulate.

Do you honestly believe that in the simulation, the power supply is not supplying any net energy to the circuit?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Do you honestly believe that in the simulation, the power supply is not supplying any net energy to the circuit?

I am not interested in the power analysis POYNTY POINT.  I'm interested in the fact that it OSCILLATES AT ALL.  That's what the simulation shows.  And there's no explanation for that oscillation.  NOT IN TERMS OF OUR STANDARD MODEL. IT IS NOT A SIMPLE OSCILLATION.  It's self sustaining.  And it occurs when the battery is disconnected.  It's the oscillation itself that is of interest.   And in REAL LIFE - in actual CONDITIONS OF EXPERIMENT and under conditions of careful switching settings  - then this results in a ZERO DISCHARGE OF ENERGY FROM THE BATTERY SUPPLY.

Regards,
Rosemary

[poynt99]

OK, I suspected you believe that.

Do you know how ludicrous that is?

[fuzzytomcat]

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315070/#msg315070   Reply #859 on: Today at 08:25:04 PM

Flux It, when I read posts like these last two - then I also know how effective is this 'misinformation' campaign.

.  We've got a technology that - on the face of it - is able to take water to boil
.  There is NO measurable loss of energy from the battery supply.
.  Neither in terms of measured wattage
.  Nor in any loss of battery voltage notwithstanding extensive use over a 26 month period.
.  This circuit is able to generate a really robust self-sustaining oscillation
.  Even in settings where the circuit is OPEN and the batteries effectively disconnected.
.  Not only this - but we cannot measure any loss of current from the battery supply using absolutely standard measurement protocols.
.  Not only that but we've organised a public demonstration of this
.  Every single academic electrical engineer from every single university in South Africa was invited
.  And NOT ONE EXPERT ATTENDED.
.  Not only this but we've open sourced every single aspect of this circuit
.  It's detailed in PESWIKI - this forum and my own blogspot thereby preventing any 'ownership' of this technolgy.
.  Not only this - but this extraordinary result was predicted in terms of a thesis that was published by me some many years ago.
.  Not only this but the circuit is really simple to replicate.
.  And not only this but the circuit is even simpler to simulate.
.  Not only this but I'm more than happy to prove this on a live internet demonstration


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg284366/#msg284366    Reply #1121 on: May 05, 2011, 06:44:30 AM

Golly - all that I see is more and more polarised opinion.  Actually PC - there have been many replications and validations.  Let me list them.
 
BP South Africa, ABB Research (NC), SASOL (SA) (who also offered a bursary award to UCT - which was declined), Spescom (SA), CSIR (SA) (confirmed  an anomaly but confined comments to one insignificant result ONLY) And between this lot - not less than 18 qualified electrical engineers - at least.  Other smaller companies and their engineers - not less than plus/minus 60 engineers - at least.

Then. AT PUBLIC DEMONSTRATIONS - including a demonstration held at MTN Sciencentre in CT where the viewers were numbered in their hundreds.  Unfortunately no academics and no experts.  Also, an earlier demo held at the conference rooms of Price Waterhouse Coopers, at least 50 members of the public and two academics.  The one academic deferred to his colleague - Professor Green who refused to comment other than saying that there were probably measurement errors.  Professor Green absolutely refused to investigate the matter further.   

THEN on the INTERNET.  FuzzyTomCat who was guided into the required waveforms by myself over many, many, many hours of discussion via SKYPE - who then replicated, allowed his data to be referenced in a paper and then systematically withdrew his data and proceeded to deny my rights to reference the work at all - notwithstanding some earlier disclosures on open source. And that evidence was seen and made available in a detailed paper which was, in turn, seen by about 3000 people on SCRIBD. Then I had my own version of the paper at SCRIBD which was withdrawn by SCRIBD on claims of plagiarism by FuzzyTomCat. Approximately 5000 hits prior to withdrawal.

And still on the subject of publications - we also had a publication in Quantum Magazine where there was a readership in the thousands.  And the publication of that paper on the internet has drawn a readership - probably upwards of of 10 000.  All culminating in our DEMO held on the 12 March, 2011 - at CPUT - where we had 15 qualified electrical engineers view the historical event of COP INFINITY - and subsequent reports and discussions of this which is certainly upwards of 1000 a day and climbing.

I need to remind you all about this.  Because what happens is that a handful of individuals including the following, Poynty, Harvey, Ion, Pickle, MileHigh, CatLady, FuzzyTomCat, Ashtweth, Mookie, Peterae and possibly a few others here - all vociferously and unfailingly and somewhat disproportionately and certainly very, very urgently - deny all.  Which inclines me to suppose that there is possibly an agenda in all their denial.  I think I've covered it all.  Hope so anyway,

Kindest regards,
Rosie

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I'll be a "HUCKLEBERRY" ......

ROSEMARY'S QUOTE -

All culminating in our DEMO held on the 12 March, 2011 - at CPUT - where we had 15 qualified electrical engineers view the historical event of COP INFINITY -


FuzzyTomCat