Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

(snip)  You are going to get a negative report back from the alleged lab.  Hopefully that will convince you and this will be all over. (snip)

You don't really believe that, do you?

In the first place she would never send her baby off to a lab that would actually do any required tests that might prove her WRONG, like comprehensive battery drawdown tests or accurate calorimetry. She has requested that they send it back to her in a WEEK !! It takes a week just to stabilize and calibrate an accurate volume calorimeter, much less test and report on a world-changing overunity zipon-containing device.

In the second place, if she has to include the magic 200 dollar IsoTech (or INSTEK) function generator along with the device.... did she also include the magic batteries? The ones that never have been recharged, except for the two that ... caught fire? I've asked this before but of course there has been no answer. And as picowatt states, the "instructions" in the letter are laughable. "Just hook it up and turn it on, crank the FG to its extreme settings, and begin measurement", essentially. But be sure to mount the device on the pegboard properly.
Perhaps there are more specific instructions included in the box.

In the third place... she will control the information, there won't be any independent report made available from people you can ask without her intervention. Just exactly like all the other supposed vettings from the various alphabet agencies she cites-- no original reports are available for inspection. The recent experience in the locked thread where she is arguing with powercat about what he himself said, or the way she continually misrepresents things other people say and do.... should give you pause. Any "report" that we will get will be filtered through Ainslie and will be positive, "confirming" her claims, and yet... the batteries will discharge and a lot of power will wind up dissipating in the mosfets themselves, so the only way any touted 100 percent efficiency claims can be true is if the entire device's total emission is counted as the "output".

And in the ..... place, .....

And in the nth place, there is no laboratory anyway. She's sent her thing off, if at all, to a couple of sycophants who probably don't know an offset from a tuffet and think that Ainslie's measurement technique and calculations are accurate and believable. It's a delaying tactic, with plenty of opportunity for the thing to get lost or damaged. For sure, it won't be tested and returned to her by July 7th.

[evolvingape]

Possible "extreme settings" operating procedure:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsX5PtVTfxg

[picowatt]

Possible "extreme settings" operating procedure:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsX5PtVTfxg

Yeah TK, set your FG like that, EXTREME SETTINGS !

(Good one EA!)

[TinselKoala]

TK,

The next time you perform tests on the NERD circuit, make sure you set the FG to its "extreme settings", as per her letter to the "reputable lab".  Surely, with your understanding of the operation of a FG, you must know what "extreme settings" means!

If I were a guitar player and the FG were a Marshall, I guess I'd rake my hand along the top of the knobs to put everything at "10".

PW

Absolutely. Get them 12AX7 plates glowing cherry red and the blue light shining through the amp tech's nightmares...


Yes, especially with the Interstate. 40 v p-p and +/- 20 v of offset....  and/or really long on times..... I could go through a pile of mosfets in a hurry with that puppy. Even with the nambypamby IsoTech GFG8216a one can, by turning the knobs to the stops, easily apply straight DC at +15 V to a mosfet gate for as long as one likes. Of course the mosfet will become ... er.... "quiescent" to use Rossi's word, pretty soon if it is also carrying 6 amps d-s.

[poynt99]

If I were a guitar player and the FG were a Marshall, I guess I'd rake my hand along the top of the knobs to put everything at "10".

PW

Unless you are "Nigel" from Spinal Tap, then you'd be goin' to eleven.