quentron.com

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'I'm asserting that the BBBV restricts the creation of a machine'

How can it restrict the creation of a machine if it has nothing to do with machines 

[profitis]

(Now I'm going to have that coffee while mr sarkeizen tries to get out his knot)

[sarkeizen]

How can it restrict the creation of a machine if it has nothing to do with machines

You need to explain to me what "nothing to do with" means in that context.

The BBBV is a proof, it's a logical consequence.  In the same way that if A is true (with sufficient generality), that the opposite statement "not A" or !A is necessarily false.  So we can say the truth of statement A restricts the truth of statement !A.

In the same way the BBBV theorem restricts the truth of the statement: "I have a quantum device that sorts 'just like a computer' with complexity of O(1).

A five year old can understand this kind of exclusion.  It's amazing that your education was so poor that you can't.  Wherever you went to school should be held up as an example of exactly what not to do in educating people.

[sarkeizen]

(Now I'm going to have that coffee while mr sarkeizen tries to get out his knot)

Don't pop any more vitamins.  They seem to make you less smart.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'im asserting that the BBBV restricts the creation of a machine like the Philip Hardcastle quenco.'

How can a theorem restrict a machines performance and at the same time insist that you meant the above in a different context