quentron.com

[profitis]

no no.im saying it will force the audience to make up their minds about the validity of everything you,ve said in this thread @sarkeizen.in fact,your refusal to answer it is making them question your validity as we speak.so im actualy enjoying this (-:

[sarkeizen]

no no.im saying it will force the audience

So it doesn't force anything about the argument "You can show that you can build an ipod charger that will work forever just from reading textbooks"?  So it's irrelevant to proving that point.  Doesn't that, to you seem like a distraction from the point?  Isn't it logical for me to ignore questions which are not relevant to the point?

Also doesn't that make you a liar yet again?  It sure seemed like you said that you would provide an irrefutable series of steps to "You can show that you can build an ipod charger that will work forever just from reading textbooks".

[profitis]

it forces everything about the argument.your validity,therefore your case about the argument.do you think it is logical for a science teacher to ask a student to build certain batteries for exams @sarkeizen.im ready to give you all the citations you ever dreamed of.all the quotes.all the logic.but not before you answer my question straightforward.what is holding you back @sarkeizen.dont hold us back with you please @sarkeizen.do you think it is logical for a science teacher to ask a student to build a hydrogen concentration cell and a copper concentration cell for exams @sarkeizen.

[sarkeizen]

it forces everything about the argument

...and just a few posts ago when I asked if it forced anything about the argument.  Which is, in case you need reminding "It is possible to learn how to build a device which will power an ipod like device forever strictly from textbooks".   You said "no".  It's right up there in the post history if you don't believe me.

I think you need to take some time and figure out exactly what you're saying.

your validity

You're going to have to be clearer because in English that really doesn't make any sense.  People don't have a quality "invalid" unless you're talking about someone who is physically crippled.

therefore your case about the argument

Dude.  Are you really that stupid?  I suppose you are, or just that much of a troll.

The majority of my 100 odd posts can be phrased as "Show me", since the crux of your argument is that one can learn this from textbooks it is reasonable that the evidence come from textbooks.  Although it's novel...in a stupid way...that you would try to demonstrate this without textbooks.  Anyway that's pretty much my case: "Show me".  So clearly your question can have no bearing on that. 

Your posts can be pretty much summed up as: "I can't" phrased in various convoluted ways with long lists of excuses, lies and evasions.

im ready to give you all the citations you ever dreamed of.all the quotes.all the logic

You are likely lying.  You told this lie before and you continue to lie about other things steadily eroding your credibility.

You have offered nothing.  You have no citations or formal logic - if you had either you could have ended this argument - or at least PROGRESSED it ages ago.  What you want me to agree to is just another attempt to distract from the point.  Which is the textbook evidence for your position and the formal logical argument which moves us from the evidence in textbooks to the conclusion.

[profitis]

do you think that a battery will work until its flat @sarkeizen.(im putting questions like these to you to catch you out.corner you and bombard you with textbook citations as soon as you answer any of them.help me to help you please :-)test me)