The correct theory of electricity

[thx1138]

A few comments about the circuit shown in posts 4 and 6 in this thread. The circuit, excluding the aerial and the ground is nothing more than a voltage quadrupler except for one thing. The diodes are 1N34 germaium diodes. Those diodes are also photodiodes, meaning they convert light to electricity.
Shine a bright flashlight on them and you will get higher voltage output. Wrap the glass cases of the diodes with black plastic tape and you will get the electricity between the elevated aerial and the ground plate connection.

[forest]

Tesla was not in hurry to uncover aspects of his discovery. I suspect he thought that humanity was not ready for it.


I missed that part below, which is the real but not complete explanation   :
And from 'In the Realm of Science: Tesla. Who Predicted Radio, Now Looks Forward to Sending Waves to the Moon', by John J. O’NEILL for New York Herald Tribune dated August 22, 1937: 'The effects at great elevations', Dr. Tesla continued, 'are due to waves of extremely small lengths produced by the sun in a certain region of the atmosphere. This is the discovery I wish to make known. The process involved in the generation of the waves is the following: The sun projects charged particles constituting an electric current which passes through a conducting stratum of the atmosphere approximately ten kilometers (six miles) thick enveloping the earth. This is a transmission of electrical energy exactly as I illustrated in my experimental lecture in which one end of a wire is connected to an electric generator of high potential, its other end being free. In this case the generator is represented by the sun and the wire by the conducting air. The passage of the solar current involves the transference of electrical charges from particle to particle with the speed of light, resulting in the production of extremely short and penetrating waves. As the air stratum mentioned is the source of the waves it follows that the so-called cosmic rays observed at great altitude must increase as this stratum is approached.'




The problem is very big damage to the information we have from Tesla; they are very fragmentary... in other article he just mention how he harnessed it.... 

[thx1138]

Two macro whirls of opposing directions in 3D space looking exactly like those cymatics ones are forming magnetic field. Macro whirls are composed of many tubular microwhirls working in synchronicity (Maxwell tubes of force in ether I suppose)


Somebody described magnetic field that way, it is not purely my imagination , however  I can't rememeber who he was.  Anyway my theory matches with that description also.
I'd like to recall who wrote such a book about magnetism, he was free energy inventor also. do you have any idea who am I thinking of ?

Now I remember who it was that described the magnetic fields that way. It was Leedskalnin. His stuff is so hard to read it doesn't stick in my mind very well.

[thx1138]

@forest: You will undoubtedly find Harold Aspden's work interesting. There is a lot of it so it will take quite a while to wade through it. The following link takes you to a page that has 10 lessons to learn to understand his perspective on the aether. This is from somewhat deep into his papers but I think it is a good starting point. http://www.aetherscience.org/www-energyscience-org-uk/tu/lessons.htm

The following link is the top level page of the web site of his works. http://www.aetherscience.org/www-energyscience-org-uk/index-2.html

He has a lot of credibility in my eyes and I'm still wading through his work so don't have much more to share about it right now. He has some British patents, he recognizes that the U.S. patent system is rigged and he has worked for IBM and some power companies so he has an insiders perspective. He is, however, a theoretical physicist rather than technologist.

[thx1138]

The problem is very big damage to the information we have from Tesla; they are very fragmentary... in other article he just mention how he harnessed it.... 

What I've found over 2 1/2 years of these studies is that you have to generally know what you are looking for, i.e. radiant energy, transmission, cosmic rays, etc.  Then go back to about 1891 and work forward reading his works specifically looking for things that relate to that one topic. He worked on so many things, often overlapping in time, that, as you say, it's hard to comprehend what exactly his thoughts were. You'll also notice that as his work progressed, just like anyone, his thoughts on the topic changed so you have to study the documentation in the sequence it was generated. One of the things that helps with this is looking at patent application dates rather than the date the patent was granted. The application dates show the point in time where he had developed his idea to the point that it could be reduced to a patent and date granted may be years later.

The reason I say 1891 is that he was mostly working on AC power generation and wired transmission and his polyphase system before then.

Something else one must grasp to make headway with his work is to understand what was NOT known at the time of the text you are reading. For instance, in 1891 the atom was still considered the indivisible minimum of matter but that changed in the late 1890's with J. J. Thomson's work on the electron. All industrial scale power was generated by coal at the time - the use of petrochemicals hadn't evolved yet. Another instance is that the jet stream was unknown and would definitely would have affected any "ionized beam to the ionosphere". Plate tectonics was not accepted until the 1960's and I imagine would have affected his transmission through the ground and may be the problem with his superluminal calculation if he thought the wave was reflecting back from the diametric opposite pole of the earth but was actually reflecting back from the tectonic plate boundary. For that matter it wasn't until the 1930's that people started to grasp that the interior of the planet has solid and liquid layers.

On the other hand, I do think the majority of his thoughts can be determined by his patents, published papers, and interviews if you know what you're looking for and you focus on one topic at a time.