Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  Guys:
  Good so see some progress, and further discussion on what makes these things tick.
 
   I've been trying out different laptop adapters to see if I can get one to work as a feed back loop. Like Roma did. As I don't have two 12v batteries, now, to use as the input source for my device. And I need my 24v PS to run my rig, for now. 
So, I'm still at all this.

   Geo.  Nice to see your device run on the batteries at 24v, or so. The one battery doesn't hold up to well at all though.
   The thrysistor idea, is worth looking into further. They are a rectifier/amplifier, and can also be bidirectional, possibly help in taming the spikes, and some heat control.
   Where and how would you mount them into the system?
   Like these Triacs, below:
   http://www.ebay.com/itm/10pcs-New-BT138-600E-BT138-600-BT138-Triacs-Thyristor-TO-220-/201594409101?hash=item2eeff6908d:g:-1YAAOSw5dNWhMw~&autorefresh=true

   Tomtech:  I'll watch your videos now.  You post in English very well.
    I'm curious as to Stalker, as well.  No self runners, as yet?

[Enjoykin2017]

Усилитель импульсов для генератора сигналов.mp4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2jN0kOP1os

Сергей Сталкер кино !!

* * * * * * * * * * *
Creating unipolar (monopolar) impulses for BTG !!

Schematic/s here
https://yadi.sk/d/8rY1WiX6vZSnw

[Tomtech29]

Hi.
I'm back after a long day spent on experimentation I had to make an additional part slice of the mosfet driver IR2113 because of the fact that he no longer had the TC4452 waiting for substitution
generally the two systems complete Alexeww Sergey I struggled for several hours , noticed a few problems during operation!
1 I start from the transistor K2611 is there resistor 0.75 Ohm current limiting I use 1.2 Ohm lot hangs on it problem occurs with a thick primary coil T.T it seems to me that you will need to use thinner wire.
2 voltage of 130 volts at a low current so induce little (prepared magnetic field)
3 fine-tuning the resonance pulses corresponding to the selected frequency with which resonates grenade u got it 1.62Mhz appears bell declining consumption of amperes of the inverter this is good news but there is also the problem of growing tension directly on the electrolyte 200V 47uF.
4 Malpractice I took 19V 3.6A Psu + step UP = 50V. the output with the proviso that the final capacitors are only 50V.inside went feedback voltage from 200V 47uF. source key K2611 and a pile of smoke I like the smell hee.
5 applies after the attempt with little reflection time for another test with higher voltage 100,200V. field around the antenna so weak that that in quotes: does not break the insulation largely reflection on the tank Lc negligible!
6 the main goal was to find the frequency and observe any changes on the bulb 60Watt the sea is not the best method nothing else came to mind?
7 back to the primary windings of the coil Tesla I also have a problem that Penetrate noise! line squeaks and so on They are transferred to a gate of a transistor push pull as if that was not enough ? chasing the signal from these impulses blindly of state hitching lack of synchronization!
- This in position placing one probe on the gate K2611 and the second channel to IR260? ... we are still able to set something.
8 little of this system of separated modules without using a base frequency failure the whole system is so unstable that someone invented may the summation of two gates at one input leg 9 (74HC14) by 10K. it probably does not work?
9 current practices conducted with aluminum foil placed inside the grenade effect: unknown
10 in none of which I conducted trials have not found answers whether it is necessary to the current toroid with ten windings ??
-my guess is that it introduces any changes in current flow in the PWM. something related to a control signal It was previously a version of the op amp LM353 which I've been able complete!.
generally, not all schemes are appropriate and me not engineer I learn only on personal mistakes
  I do not want anyone to enter the channel from its Lajb "do not do yourself harm"
quietly anyhow forward.
so much for the present moment I greet and to the next.

[stivep]

My dear South-American Serb Nik Zec - if OU does not exist why thaт a lot of very inteligent people who made successful OU devices were brutally killed by governements special services all around the world ??

by chance ?? 

I don´t think so !!

Second , what about known facts from famous Thomson´s Philadelphia experiment from 1872 year , or Joseph Henry experiment from 1842 years ?

Do you still thinking - OU effect does not exist and OU devices are technical mirage ?

.........................................
From the Gerry Vassilatos book "LOST SCIENCE"

This energy had been accidentally generated in 1872 by Thomson and Houston. Not waves, but rays. Electrical rays. A forgotten phenomenon. Unidirectional electric impulses of great power radiated electric rays, not waves. These rays penetrated all kinds of matter, whether stone and steel alike. The resultant sparks could be drawn from every insulated metal object in the
large building in which the experiment was being performed. Not radiowaves, but electric rays.

Later in that century, Nikola Tesla accidentally observed the same electric ray production. He studied the phenomenon exclusively, developing impulse generators and electric ray projectors. When Tesla speaking of electric rays which evidenced a light-like nature he referred to this phenomenon. Not radiowaves, but electric rays. New light. Dr. Rife had rediscovered this phenomenon. Tesla spoke of his own "millimeter rays", mentioning their "bacteriocidal" value. This same phenomenon had vindicated Tesla's words. Therapeutic properties were demonstrated when precisely controlled.

From the Peter A. Lindemann, book The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity,"

Tesla was truly mystified by this strange new phenomenon, and searched the literature for references to its characteristics. No such reference was found, except in the surreptitious observations of two experimenters. In one case, Joseph Henry observed the magnetization of steel needles by a heavy spark discharge. The extraordinary feature of this observation (1842) lay in the fact that the Leyden jar, whose spark apparently produced the magnetizations, stood on the upper floor of an otherwise electrically impervious building. Brick walls, thick oak doors, heavy stone and iron flooring, tin ceilings. Moreover, the steel needles were housed in a vault in the cellar.

How did the spark affect such a change through such a natural barrier?

Dr. Henry believed that the spark had released special "light-like rays", and these were the penetrating agencies responsible for the magnetizations. metal tabletop. Again reactivating the coil
produced a shrieking silver-white spark, entirely visible to any whom sat in the last row. Wishing to show this to a colleague, Edwin Houston, Thomson made for the door and was abruptly stopped. Touching the brass knob on the otherwise insulated oak door, Thomson received an unexpected sizzling shock. Turning off the Ruhmkorrf Coil, Thomson found it possible to stop the effect. Calling for Edwin, he summarized what had occurred. Then turning the unit back on again, the stinging charge effects returned. The two gentlemen ran  throughout the huge stone, oak, and iron building with insulated metal objects now. Each touch of a penknife or screwdriver to anything metallic, however distant from the coil or insulted from the floor, produced long and continuous white sparks. The account was written up as a short article in Scientific American later in the same year.

In studying each of these two prior observations, events each separated by some thirty years, Tesla perceived an essential unity with that of his own discovery. Each observation was perhaps a slight variant of the very same phenomenon.  Somehow accidentally, each experimenter had managed to produce the explosive supercharging effect. In the case of Dr. Henry, the explosive bursts occurred in a single flash, electrostatic machines being used to accumulate the initial charge. The second case was peculiar, since it evidenced the sustained and continuous production of super-charging effects. The effect was rare because it obviously required very stringent electrical parameters. Tesla deduced this from the simple fact that the effect was so infrequently observed by experimenters the world over. In addition, he was quick to remark concerning the anomalous attributes attached to the phenomenon. Tesla knew that, despite the extremely penetrating effects in each case, he had secured the only means for achieving the "complete" and maximum manifestation of supercharging. His was an apparatus with no equal, capable of releasing an aspect of the electrostatic field which others very apparently had not.

Though discovered by Tesla in 1889, the preliminary observation of this effect was published after an intensive battery of investigations. "The Dissipation of Electricity", published just prior to Christmas of 1892, is the pivotal Tesla lecture. This is the departure point in which Tesla abandons research and development of high frequency alternating current..

What kind of Natural matter can magnetize and electrify heavy isolated matalic objects at very long distances ?
...........................

Why nobody can find Tesla´s famous lecture "The Dissipation of Electricity" , from 1892 year.? Why this Tesla´s lecture is so dangerous to humankind and why is so special.?

Nik Zec удачного дня !! 

Enjoykin

the answer is simple
Overunity in physics does not exists!!!
Overunity in economy of facts  exists only as  economical gain.

I suggest  at minimum to watch this video at its current time or view it from the very beginning.
https://youtu.be/8Hf3SKcn4OI?t=246

Our "overunity " comes from initial investment in energy that comes from our pocket  and that allows us to couple to  energy source that we do not have pay for

Wesley


PS:  DO WE HAVE HERE ANYONE WHO IS FROM SERBIA?

[forest]

This article is still here, but the subject is a bit different. It might be Tesla wrote another one which was not widely published ...http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-12-21.htm