Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[AlienGrey]

 
 
   AlienGrey:  I'm not sure what you're trying to point out when you mention,  XO-OR'd?

Thanks for pointing that out, On my device if i set my device up to a sqr wave output my amplitude gain is inverted as 'f' goes up so does amplitude as far as my yoke is concerned peeking at about 29khz, that's no good to me as my design is more like 17 to 25 kHz not sure exactly as need more caps to experiment with.  but with my current setup yoke winding, I think I can get what I want 17-25khz. will try to do a quick video to show what's going on later provided nothing changes.

[NickZ]

  AG:
  Try adding more WIMA caps on the 3t coil circuit. You normally need at least one 0.47uf 1000v-2000v cap, or two of those caps. Other caps may work also, but, possibly not as well. Geo uses some of his 0.33uf caps, on top of the WIMA caps, and at the outputs. As the WIMA caps are very expensive in comparison.
 
   Akula states that his resonant points were at 17,27, and 37KHz. But, each self running device has been shown running at different frequencies. So don't try to replicate their resonant points, but look for where the sync happens on your device, instead. You'll know when you hit it, as the output will increase by quite a bit, and will drop when you pass it. Test with a load and ground line attached. Ground line going to the Kacher also, as those are not just small details.
 
   You should not have that kind of ringing on the square wave signal, as it should be abrupt, and not continuing to ring.

   I also see the signal inverting at certain frequencies, but no idea as to why it does that, as yet.

[stivep]

https://youtu.be/A_cJDvtcAxE
Wesley

[Bat1Robin2]

Pulse width input is generally energy input if no other changes are made. so therefore once enough energy is given to a system then a less efficient resonant multiple point can be seen ringing on the output. Also as pulse width increases it begins to deny or reject higher resonant frequencies. This is because it is more of a thud than a ding if that makes sense.  I seem to find that a pulse width of 25 -33%or so of the frequency your trying to efficiently ring is most efficient.  I bet the higher frequency ring output will begin to be seen as pulse width is being decreased. Following this theory a pulse width of 200 ns should ring my tesla 1.25mhz = (800 ns cycle time) most efficiently however im hitting a limit at 500 ns on my circuit capability. And my low speed arduino is limiting my input frequency range to 40 khz. i cant seem to get florescent to light well until i go clear into the 4 us pulse width. I already reported my most efficient yoke freq and pulse width before. This is just my opinion and does not mean anything important just trying to contribute my point of view. Not one single thing i have seen yet seems to be unusual. I may try and external generator input to see what happens at a higher frequency input and keep the 500 ns pulse width.

[NickZ]

  Bat1Robin2:
  Perhaps then you should abandon the use of the arduino and build the TL494 board with the TC4420 fet driver circuit that most all the self running devices are using now. There may be other ways to go at it, but you'll be on your own if you go that route. And it would be best to be able to compare notes, and get up to speed on the same circuit.

   What I'm seeing when I view Itsu's last video of his circuit replication, is that something happens when he goes off resonance, the signal totally gets distorted, and does not work at all, then cleans up again at the next resonant point. I don't know if this is normal or not, but I am seeing the same or similar thing on my device. Perhaps someone can comment on that. As we have not seen the same effect shown on the supposed working self runners, as they have not been showing what happens when sweeping through the full duty cycle and frequency ranges on their devices on a scope, as a comparison to what some of us are seeing on ours.