Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 98 Guests are viewing this topic.

Belfior

Quote from: forest on January 05, 2019, 11:25:29 AM
Let me put a little notice here. Output returned to bettery is always less then taken from battery ... Unless you did something stupid and your emf is not taken purely from battery but from ambient field. Stiveip would here pop up with schumann resonance theory but in fact many did the same in late XIX century just using coils and iron core. The break from emf and current is what allow overunity. A nd you can take free electrons also....

Well I think it comes down to internal resistance of the cap or battery. The equation for charge in a cap does not involve current. So in my mind it come down to resistance. How much current do you need to get the cap into the required voltage level? So if a cap goes to 9000v with a 9000v pulse, then we have something, because voltage we can manufacture. Then if we charge the cap 60k per second and the load takes power out 60 times per second, I think we got something else too. So if we get into voltage pulse == big charge that is the amps you need. If current would play a major role with caps, you could see that from the equation. but that charge in the cap turn straight into current. An area worth to look at. With maxwell saying it is the rate of change that determines the displacement current. In DC circuit usually very easy. some rate of change while the caps charge and then 0. In AC circuits it is a total different thing. Rate of change == displacement current

lancaIV

displacement : inrush cold conductor/ hot conductor rush-hour/ freeway= superconducting state Not ideal state= no resistance but ultra-low resistance !
Look for the "coil,channel,tube"- dimension on micro-/ nano-chips and the electronic flow in quantity and compare this with 1mm radius coil !
to resist,  resistance, resistor to trans-(res-) istor and circuit : 1,10,100,.......How many circuits on 1square centimerter micro-chip/photovoltaic cell modul ? How many milli-/ centi-/meters conductor on 1 sqmm ?

  "Inrush pulses", controled by " soft 'cold ' electricity" drive;
    hot conductor ~ EDM effect= erosive and coil lifetime use shortening
Electric  circuit a. 0°C cooling b.0° F cooling c. 0° K cooling or RTS coil/ tube
Sharp Voltage fall to Zero Voltage : Phenomen , thermical ? Steady constant velocity, acceleration, deceleration


SolarLab

F.Y.I. 

Attached a zip file brief relating to "Does using High Voltage to Increase Electron Inertia
yield Generated Electric Power?" 

[[[File doesn't like .rar or.zip - so I'll just paste it here]]]

ELECTRON INERTIA 
ELECTROMAGNETIC   MOMENTUM  AND  ELECTRON  INERTIA  IN  A  CURRENT CIRCUIT
By  Professor  E.  G.  CULLWICK,  O.B.E.,  M.A.,  D.Sc,  F.R.S.E.,  Member.
(The paper  was first received 12th April, and in revised form13th  June, 1955. It was published
as  an INSTITUTION  MONOGRAPH in September, 1955) 

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/64e4/8cc38d68decf787fda1519db1f51f25a13a2.pdf  

Conservation of Energy. Readings on the Origins of the First Law of Thermodynamics. Part II
Jaime Wisniak, Department of Chemical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva,
Israel 4105. Correo electrónico: wisniak@bgumail.bgu.ac.il 

http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-893X2008000300010 

Ingles (English) pdf
http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/eq/v19n3/v19n3a10.pdf 

See notable page 222: Hermann Ludwig von Helmholtz (1821-1894)

"Helmholtz concludes this section as follows: "

(a) Whenever natural bodies act upon each other by forces of attraction or repulsion, which are independent
of time and velocity, the sum of their *** vires vivae and tensions must be constant; the maximum quantity
of work which can be obtained from them is therefore fixed and finite; 

(b) if, on the contrary, bodies possess forces which depend upon time and velocity, or which act in other
directions than the lines which unite each two separate material points, for example, forces of rotation, then
combinations of such bodies would be possible in which force might be either lost or gained ad infinitum."

*** vis viva noun  vis vi·va | \-ˈvīvə\       plural    vires vivae\-īˌvē \
Definition of vis viva : the force of a moving body calculated as the product of its mass and the square of
its velocity : twice the kinetic energy   ***

DOES USING HIGH VOLTAGE TO INCREASE ELECTRON INERTIA
YIELD GENERATED ELECTRIC POWER? 

Based on Helmholtz's conclusion above consider rapidly increasing the "tension" by pulsed high voltage.
In the patent below, paragraph [0002], replace the "electron mass reduction" idea with the "pulsed high
voltage" concept.

US 2014/O159845 A1 Jun. 12, 2014 
SELF-SUSTAININGELECTRIC-POWER GENERATOR. UTILIZINGELECTRONS OF LOW INERTIAL MASS
TO MAGNIFY INDUCTIVE
   Inventor    William N. Barbat 

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/a7/7e/ef/a4f6ce53545d68/US20140159845A1.pdf 

Abstract
Electrical oscillations in a "sending coil" radiate inductive photons toward one or more "energy-magnifying
coils" comprised of a photoconductor, doped semiconductor, or a superconductor. Electrons of low inertial
mass in the energy-magnifying coil(s) receive from the sending coil a transverse force having no in-line
backforce. The low-mass electrons in the energy-magnifying coil(s) receive acceleration proportional to
normal electron mass divided by the lower mass. Secondarily radiated inductive-photon energy is magnified
proportionally to the electrons' greater acceleration, squared. Magnified inductive-photon energy from the
energy-magnifying coil(s) induces oscillating electric energy in one or more "output coil(s)." The electric
energy output exceeds energy input if more of the photon-induction energy is directed toward the output
coil(s) than as a counter force to the sending coil. After initiating the oscillations, the generation of electric
power becomes self-sustaining.

FIELD
[0002]  This disclosure introduces a technical field in which practical electrical energy is created in accordance
with the overlooked exception to the energy-conservation rule that Herman von Helmholtz described in his
1847 doctrine on energy conservation: "If . . . bodies possess forces which depend upon time and velocity, or
which act in directions other than lines which unite each pair of material points, . . . then combinations of such
bodies are possible in which force may be either lost or gained ad infinitum." A transverse inductive force qualifies
for Helmholtz's ad infinitum rule, but this force is not sufficient of itself to cause a greater energy output than
input when applied to electrons of normal mass due to their unique charge-to-mass ratio. However, the increased
acceleration of conduction electrons of less-than-normal inertial mass, as occurs in photoconductors, doped
semiconductors, and superconductors, is proportional to the normal electron mass divided by the low electron mass,
and the magnification of harnessable inductive energy is proportional to the greater relative acceleration, squared.

BACKGROUND
[0003]  Magnetic force also satisfies Helmholtz's exemption to the energy-conservation rule because magnetic force
is transverse to the force that causes it, and magnetic force is determined by the "relative velocity" (i.e., perpendicular
to the connecting line) between electric charges. Magnification of magnetic force and energy was demonstrated by
E. Leimer (1915) in the coil of a speaker phone and in the coil of a galvanometer when he irradiated a radio
antenna-wire with radium. A 10-milligram, linear radium source produced a measured 2.6-fold increase in electrical
current in the antenna-wire in comparing inaudible radio reception without radium to audible reception with radium.
This represented a (2.6)2=7× increase in electrical energy flowing through the respective wire coils. The possibility
of this enhanced reception being attributed to a person's body holding the unit of radium to the wire was eliminated
by Leimer's additional observation that, whenever the orientation of the small radium unit was changed to
approximately 30 degrees relative to the wire, the energy enhancement ceased.

end of this part



Food for thought!

FWIW - this file in zip format works at http://www.aboveunity.com/  so it must be a glitch between this file in zip format
and the system here ??? Oh well... 


FIN

SolarLab

 And an older one; "Notes..." that was posted before [included to fix a bad load] but a good paper anyway...   :D   



forest

Everybody talks about AC reactance but the real deal is how capacitor reacts to DC pulses. Could somebody help in that area?