Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

What kind of calculator can be used to calculate an unknown coil? Im not saying you dont know what your coils design is.Im saying you dont know what figuera's coil design is. If you did know you would know more important features of the design which would be the focus like how and where to close the loop so the power in from source is balanced with the power out from the induced coil so it would be able to run without the source after it starts up. Closing the loop is the only important part but the term closing the loop is a poor substitute that will have to suffice. The drawings are abstract to explain the process only.

Cadman

Quote from: Doug1 on August 25, 2014, 10:45:41 PM
What kind of calculator can be used to calculate an unknown coil? Im not saying you dont know what your coils design is.Im saying you dont know what figuera's coil design is. If you did know you would know more important features of the design which would be the focus like how and where to close the loop so the power in from source is balanced with the power out from the induced coil so it would be able to run without the source after it starts up. Closing the loop is the only important part but the term closing the loop is a poor substitute that will have to suffice. The drawings are abstract to explain the process only.

Hi Doug,

The calculator is just a spreadsheet. The generator produces 19v 25a. The excitation current is about 2.15 amp. The net output is after the generator is 'looped', it is part of the losses calculated. There is nothing special about the coils in my design. The majority of the dynamos built were self-excited so it's not a new concept.

Regards



bajac

 It was not my original intention to publish the attached document related to air gap issues. I wanted to run some experiments first to validate this theory. I then thought that someone in this forum might have already come across with these issues. The question that I am trying to answer is, does the insertion of an air gap in an iron core substantially decrease the magnetic flux lines? Or, is this apparent reduction of the net field caused by a negative self-inductancion?
Please, let me know your thoughts. Thanks.
Bajac

hanon

Hi,

I agree that current theory is flawed. We are not going to obtain overunity devices using current equations and models. In some moment in history we chose an incorrect , or limited, theory.

An interesting read: https://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/Electrodynamics.html

forest

Quote from: hanon on August 26, 2014, 01:55:31 PM
Hi,

I agree that current theory is flawed. We are not going to obtain overunity devices using current equations and models. In some moment in history we chose an incorrect , or limited, theory.

An interesting read: https://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/Electrodynamics.html

Maybe the error was in other place ? How the incorrect theory would allow so much progress ?