Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 24 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

 Thanks EMJunkie i appreciate kind words.

Yes Figueras knew that he had to mimic those exact motions in his stationary device that is why he chose to raise and lower the currant in his electromagnets.... utter Genius.

Hanon; it can't be that way because if it was with the two different poles next to each other the flux leakage would be so bad that hardly any power would be created. the flux would jump across to the other pole and not through the core. they are as you have stated before ( NN) not one but all of them. the entire device has to be all N or all S not both. no where in his patent does it say anything about polarity, people just (assumed ) it was before investigating. by being the same polarity on the opposite end and taken down it helps amplify the incoming signal without interacting with the other electromagnet. if the other electromagnet was a south pole the entire core and electromagnets would act as one. even if it was next to it it would lets say magnetic short circuit if you will. this is not what we want.
the rest of what you say is right but i can't justify the cost of square pure iron that is why i choose bar iron. easy to assemble to.
of course laminated can be used as i was so informed but i really want the most bang for my buck if you know what i mean.

NNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNN

be good everyone and happy Figuering !

antijon

Hey Sam, thanks for sharing. Great waveform too. I see you get the basics of the modulation, and why it's required. I don't know electronics, but I don't really see any need for improvement. If you decide to test it, maybe with a transformer with know turns ratios, I'd be interested in the results.  ;D

Hanon, as far as the original coil design, I think we talked about it in the past, but is "reels" of induced coils the proper translation? In his previous motionless patent, he mentioned that it resembles an induction coil in principle, so we know that he was familiar with induction coils.

From wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_coil
Quotethe secondary coil is wound in many thin flat pancake-shaped sections (called "pies"), connected in series. The primary coil is first wound on the iron core, and insulated from the secondary with a thick paper or rubber coating. Then each secondary subcoil is connected to the coil next to it, and slid onto the iron core,

I know the article is about induction coils, but Figuera may have used the term "reels" to refer to previously rolled coils that were slid onto the iron rod.

Also heard Paul Babcock say, if you want to use iron for cores go to an ammo shop and buy soft iron birdshot for shotguns. He said he used acrylic to coat the shot then formed it in molds.
This is what I'm talking about: http://www.ballisticproducts.com/Steel-Shot-8-bag_10/productinfo/SH08/

hanon

Marathonman,


I find difficult to believe that someone has a working device, and he just contacted you in order to help you and he do not want to help the rest of users. Sorry but you are not the kindest person to deal with if someone do not share your ideas. That person supposedly told you his findings while you were trying another design.  I can guess that you surely did not accept those finding at first. I refer to your mood just by watching your behaviour with some users as NRamaswami, Darediamond, Sam, Antijon or even me when some of us just posted discrepancies with you transverse coil design (now abandoned by you) or just by advising you of some weak points to take into consideration as I tried to do. I will love to believe you and I would love to know that somebody had discovered the key. That was my aim by sharing all this in this thread. But I can not get it how you could have access to such info.


Antijon,


The translation is fine. Figuera used some old words that are not currently in use in spanish electromagnetism jargon. For example he used sometimes the word "carrete" (reel) a word that today is not in use and everybody tend to use the word "bobina" (coil) instead. Anyway I copied the original spanish text in order anyone could improve the translation if required. You may try to re-translate any parragraph with Google translator. I really think that the key is not hidden in some special word. I tend to think that the real key are the polarity and the geometrical dimensions and placement of the coils.


marathonman

Quote from: hanon on December 10, 2015, 05:35:34 PM
Marathonman,


I find difficult to believe that someone has a working device, and he just contacted you in order to help you and he do not want to help the rest of users. Sorry but you are not the kindest person to deal with if someone do not share your ideas. That person supposedly told you his findings while you were trying another design.  I can guess that you surely did not accept those finding at first. I refer to your mood just by watching your behaviour with some users as NRamaswami, Darediamond, Sam, Antijon or even me when some of us just posted discrepancies with you transverse coil design (now abandoned by you) or just by advising you of some weak points to take into consideration as I tried to do. I will love to believe you and I would love to know that somebody had discovered the key. That was my aim by sharing all this in this thread. But I can not get it how you could have access to such info.

Well i can't really deny anything you said except about the person in question.  i was the one that pmed  him because of some of the clues he dropped to us that no one ever thought twice about except ME apparently.  so i pmed more and found out he has had a device for over a year now and he shared much, much more to me. that is why my design took a radical turn.  i do not know why he won't share, i haven't a clue in the world.  i really don't care or want to care why. it really wouldn't bother me if this server crashed tomorrow but one thing i did do is shared everything he relayed to me to everyone on this forum.
the information posted over the last month will allow someone to build a Figueras device.  open your mind and really look especially at my last few post and you will know, if not well i can't help that only God can.