Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

digitalindustry; take some high ohmage wire for your resistor section, wire it like the pic shows and take your own LCR meter if you own one and measure the inductance. you will get a reading that is so low that amounts to nothing.
so that leads me to believe in the following.

#1 you haven't read not one single patent.
#2 typical human reaction to over complicate a simplex design.
#3 being guided by taught dogma from status quo instructors.
#4 being paid to do so because we are at the point of production.
#5 just a complete idiot that likes to disrupt people.
#6 knows enough to think he knows everything.

NOW digitalindustry pick ANY TWO !

anyone that didn't  mention this in 190 pages is either

A - Paid by a gov or corporation to mislead you or
B - was misled by A

apparently Clemente Figueras never got this memo and forgot to put it in his patent.

Have a nice Figueras Day !

[marathonman]

NRamaswami;
Quote;
"The arrangement has to follow the natural law of a Magnet having two opposite poles at two ends. So the connection has to be NS-NS-NS. The core is a continuous core. Of course many cores are interconnected to form the device of Figuera. It is very simple to replicate."

What planet are you on ? you couldn't be farther off if you tried. the only thing you got right in that book of a post was that it IS very simple to replicate.
i'm sorry to inform you but it SN-Y-NS. any other way you might as well be beating your head against a Mars rock.

"The arrangement has to follow the natural law of a Magnet"

is that why your feet swelled up, you were following the natural law's ?

Have a Nice Figueras Day !

[digitalindustry]

digitalindustry; take some high ohmage wire for your resistor section, wire it like the pic shows and take your own LCR meter if you own one and measure the inductance. you will get a reading that is so low that amounts to nothing.
so that leads me to believe in the following.

#1 you haven't read not one single patent.
#2 typical human reaction to over complicate a simplex design.
#3 being guided by taught dogma from status quo instructors.
#4 being paid to do so because we are at the point of production.
#5 just a complete idiot that likes to disrupt people.
#6 knows enough to think he knows everything.

NOW digitalindustry pick ANY TWO !

anyone that didn't  mention this in 190 pages is either

A - Paid by a gov or corporation to mislead you or
B - was misled by A

apparently Clemente Figueras never got this memo and forgot to put it in his patent.

Have a nice Figueras Day !

hey i'm not trying to give you a hard time.

- coils of wire have inductance and all the other parameters i stated, it's a fact, you can 'wiki' it of you like.

- i expect Figuera had to purchase the much older model of Arduino and he probably had to code it in machine code, so its just not a fair comparison, when he wrote his Patent he probably left all that out.

: D

yes in case anyone has been recently hit on the head that last part was sarcasm, all i said previous to that is fact, thinking more about it i'd probably just make it straight up how he described, vectoring on the 'V' shape of the inductors.

i'm sure people have achieved it both ways, and a mix , by adding caps etc.

[digitalindustry]

  it will work with resistor too , just no or very little overunity 

yep i think you'd essentially have some sort of transformer bi-transformer.

may as well put a toroid in a toroid and play with that.

[forest]

yep i think you'd essentially have some sort of transformer bi-transformer.

may as well put a toroid in a toroid and play with that.

yep, that's why he (Figuera) didn't stopped with arrangement of two AC currents shifted in phase in his second device
i wish i could have resources to replicate his devices