Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[antijon]

3. I have no comments to make on NN or NS. I have made both of them to work and I'm aware that for SN-NS-SN kind of thing to work you need a different geometry and the straight line does not permit it. If you go back to the earlier pages there are people admitting that identical poles produce zero volts.

Ramaswami, sorry man, but it does work, and quite well. Even in a simulator.

Guys, you should try this sometime if you're bored. The resistor is variable, so it can be adjusted on the fly. It's just crazy watching the currents. And I still have no clue exactly how to replicate it (solid-state), but that's the schematic in a nutshell.

How2, yeah, I removed those simulator shots because they were nothing out of the ordinary. No OU, just me misreading the scopes.

What rotates the  rotating-switch-unit,  I cannot see a motor mentioned in the device,  or even any permanent-magnets  to cause a homopolar-motor  effect .

A motor rotates his commutator. Buforn stated in his patent that the output AC is rectified by a switch. The resulting DC powers the commutator motor and also provides the DC for the exciter magnets.

Tesla's switch was like a spark gap, intended to produce high frequency oscillations. This is quite different, it's more like a controlled magnetic field.

could those winding's be considered a load because they are not yet the temporary-magnet that the electrical-current turns them into.

I see where you're going man, but windings draw current based on their resistance. They only reason they draw less than this is due to reactance, or a change in their inductance.

[NRamaswami]

Ouch..

I made a mistake..I wrote SN-NS-SN  -- This is a bar magnet proper with two different poles at two ends. Here you are reversing middle secondary. Secondary is placed between opposite poles of primary.  Please do an experiment and let me know what is the voltage you are getting. Not in simulator and whether the voltage is able to light up the lamps.

This is what I should have written SN-SN-NS..This is what is against the law of Nature. This is what does not work. Identical poles of primary facing each other and secondary being placed in between.  My apologies for this. Many have tried this and have reported in the forum to be zero voltage as I have also found. Secondary placed between. The question was whether secondary placed between identical poles of two primary would produce output. That is what I was answering but made the primary poles opposite. My apologies. 

[Glenn_FR]

Hi all,
Not had much time to work on this stuff the last few evenings.  But I can answer the question about "SN-(coil)-NS" : using proper 180° phased NON-ZERO-CROSSING sinewaves : yes, there is output.  I can't yet say how much because my coils overheat before I can get to take proper measurements.  What I do know is that I'm seeing a full reversal AC output current : if I place two white LEDs mounted back to back ( anode to cathode) across the coil they both light up.

Have tried using proper PWM with the conventional comparator that compares a high frequency ramp signal and my input sinewave, but the HF part of the signal is causing induced currents in the pickup coil that disturb the 'real' signal - so I'm not convinced that it's a good path.

More news soon.  I will also try two identical pickups wired as in the diagrams posted the other day : "[SN]-(SN)(NS)-[NS]"
() = electromagnet; [] = pickup coil

[marathonman]

Glen i think your (), [] are backwards.
you have to deal with your heating issue before anything else. i had one along time ago come to find out it was my cores were to small for the amount of flux i needed.
i think the HF is causing your cores to heat up, this will cause the issues you are having. steel can not handle anything like that also try 22 awg or larger cores.... you can order pure iron core in small quantities at the link i am giving you but be aware they are high priced or you can just hack large transformer. here is link.  http://www.surepure.com/Iron/a/17
good work.

[Glenn_FR]

I will also try two identical pickups wired as in the diagrams posted the other day : "[SN]-(SN)(NS)-[NS]"
() = electromagnet; [] = pickup coil

Yes, thankyou Marathonman, I meant : [] = electromagnet; () = pickup coil.   Too late at night 

I'm printing a second set of pickup coil formers at this very moment.

P.S. I'm puzzled : I can't find any way to correct my original post.  Why can't I edit my own posts ?