Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

Marathonman

"Doug,
Your post seems to be quite profound. I have read and reread to try to follow it as far as my knowledge in electrical machinery allows me. Please tell me if I have understood it fine: there are two fields : one required to maintain the load charged and other to keep the machine rotating at its speed to counteract the dragging. Understood fine or not?"

There are two fields yes but what i want you to consider treating the magnetic fields as if they are made up of two parts for each single magnet. One part being the part which will flood over the coil causing induction the other part the force making it move. An extra amount which replaces the force of the prime mover.

Doug1

If your going to use both poles from a single magnet you end up needing to move the physical magnet to move the field in and out of relation the coil of induction. The time it takes for the field strength of an electromagnet to reach a high enough state is too slow ,it also has a lot of other things fighting it from going into the coil of induction in the form of load resistance and the time for the magnetic domains of the core to flip in the core with the coil being induced. If this were not true generator field magnets would not have to use dc to excite the field, generators would reach full output the instant the field starting turning and there would be no physical resistance to the rotation like the coging effect and there would be no additional strain against the rotation as the load is increased and there would be no lag in the output when a new load is introduced. In actual use as the load increases the engine or motor has to increase it's output of power to overcome the additional strain caused by an increase in the load. These things are not avoidable.
Using two magnets in opposition you need only reduce the strength of one by just enough to enable the other with out reducing the weaker one so much that it takes too long for it to build up enough again. Just like when you use two permanent magnets and physically move the coil between them, the proximity of the coil to the closest magnet will be the one who's field is inducing the coil. The directional flow of flux of the two same poles are opposite each other giving rise to the change in flux which you need to have induction. When you use ac rectified and split into the two coils the field is dropping off too low. The opposite magnet is preventing it from building back up to a high enough strength. If this field of a single magnet were comprised of two different sources one for the DC field and one for the fluctuation the field will not be able to drop off only the portion used for the fluctuation is making the change. It even works that way in a properly built part G with the rotating brush. Im sure you can find a way to cheat the original design but I personally find the value to be in the conquest of the original.

ignacio

Doug1: estas tu desvariando....

Doug1: these your ranting ....

marathonman

Doug;
I'm sure you can find a way to cheat the original design but I personally find the value to be in the conquest of the original.

Been their am doing that, but you are right the whole Figuera device has been a real conquest and i can't thank you enough.  all people do is trip on your post instead of reading and studying what you said like some Mental Midget. you are a smart MF and i for one am glad you were on this forum.
these stupid tech support people from different countries should zip their mouths and listen but "NO" all they do is blast out stupid shit like a fertilizer spreader to all the minions.

Yes i will post my been their am doing that soon with pic's and proof.

Thanks Doug , would love to see a good pile up.

Tech support very funny.

a.king21

My 2 cents worth:


It has occured to me that these effects may only be present in large coils. This is something which Joseph Newman has noticed.


The reason is that coils have a negligible resistance, so a huge coil can be driven with very little current.


Is there any indication anywhere of the SIZE of Figuera's coils? - other than vague newspaper reports.