Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

Bajac"

Just saw your post..

I think you indicated the air gap to be present between the cores if I'm correct. If not I apologize.

How can there be an air gap between opposite poles? The iron will lierally crush any material that you put in there. Alternately if were to put a strong material the magnetic flux will be considerably reduced. Assuming you put holes (best case) between the air gap to let the magnetic flow continues what is the advantage of it in having a continuous iron core? I have always used continuous iron core. Never had any problems. The continuous iron core made up of rods however has many airgaps that let the air flow through the core so it cools the rods.

I'm unable to accept the idea that the cores have an iron gap.Can you please advise on this?

Again I apologize if you did not suggest the air gap theory. I have not read your paper on Figuera and now for me the interest is only to learn what others do as I have failed in my efforts. 

[bajac]

One more thing, I did stated that the patent claims are useless for understanding the concept. The reason being that if the subject matter is not disclosed in the specification (sketches and description) part of the patent, then it cannot be claimed. If you specification describes a mirror, i.e., you are not supposed to claim a car. The patent laws are so strict on this respect that it is not allowed to add any new subject matter to the patent once it is submitted. You will have to resubmit a new patent, which might not be allowed if whatever was first disclosed make the new subject matter obvious.

Interestingly, your claims are allowed to infringe on other patents as long as you add novel and nonobvious material. For example, the first patent for the vacuum tube was the diode, which consisted of the anode and cathode only. Then, the patent for the triode consisting of the anode, cathode, and gate was also awarded. Because the structure of the triode is basically the diode claimed in an earlier patent, the owner of the triode patent had to pay royalties to the owner of the diode patent. That should tell you that what is in the claimed is not necessarily what the invention is about. Do you follow me?

Don't get me started on the patent area. I am pretty good at it!

I do not need to write a post with 3,000 words of nonsense to make my point and be understood. It is only done by a person who normally does not understand what he/she is writing about.

[marathonman]

 JEALOUSNESS! of what,  a moron that knows squat of part G.  hell you miss lead people for years why stop now. your the reason people are still gagging on the drawing.

WHERE is YOUR WORKING DEVICE. "NOT"  BECAUSE YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE. you think because your some big time electrician that people should listen to your NONSENSE.

hell my 13 year old roommates grand daughter even said that guy's stupid. he don't know sqat. crap i laughed for an hour.

Good luck people YOU WILL NEED IT.

PS. your paper was a complete JOKE that is worthless except for starting the fire place.  HOW PRECIOUS !

[bajac]

JEALOUSNESS! of what,  a moron that knows squat of part G.  hell you miss lead people for years why stop now. your the reason people are still gagging on the drawing.

WHERE is YOUR WORKING DEVICE. "NOT"  BECAUSE YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE. you think because your some big time electrician that people should listen to your NONSENSE.

hell my 13 year old roommates grand daughter even said that guy's stupid. he don't know sqat. crap i laughed for an hour.

Good luck people YOU WILL NEED IT.

PS. your paper was a complete JOKE that is worthless except for starting the fire place.  HOW PRECIOUS !

You have just proved my point. THANK YOU.

You are acting like a kid who does not have what it takes to make it a constructive forum. Because you lack the basics, you go on a rant calling people names behaving like an ignorant. You look very frustrated and explosive. You should take some time off the forum to prevent posting things that you will later regret.

[bajac]

Bajac"

Just saw your post..

I think you indicated the air gap to be present between the cores if I'm correct. If not I apologize.

How can there be an air gap between opposite poles? The iron will lierally crush any material that you put in there. Alternately if were to put a strong material the magnetic flux will be considerably reduced. Assuming you put holes (best case) between the air gap to let the magnetic flow continues what is the advantage of it in having a continuous iron core? I have always used continuous iron core. Never had any problems. The continuous iron core made up of rods however has many airgaps that let the air flow through the core so it cools the rods.

I'm unable to accept the idea that the cores have an iron gap.Can you please advise on this?

Again I apologize if you did not suggest the air gap theory. I have not read your paper on Figuera and now for me the interest is only to learn what others do as I have failed in my efforts.

NRamaswami,

I think the air gaps is one of the points of conflicts or arguments. I referred to the air gaps because it is what the sketch shows and because it made sense with the analysis described in my paper.

It is OK if you do not believe that the air gaps should exist. I respect your opinion. And because you are the one spending time and money on the prototype, you should go with what you believe.

You see, Matathoman, I am not getting mad or calling people names because they do not agree with me. But it will be difficult to change at your age. You already stated that you are a grandfather.