Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 74 Guests are viewing this topic.

lancaIV

Quote from: marathonman on October 19, 2016, 12:12:24 PM
SORRY FELLAS BUT THIS THREAD IS DEAD THANKS TO LANCA.

MM
Oh yeah, he is soooo reallly Deaed,indeed !
Probably to realize easier good ideas by transforming 2D visions into 3D space-volume devices :
http://www.inpama.com/index.php?content=invention&id=1126


You remeber : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3efV2wqEjEY


Bye-Bye
             OCWL

hanon

An interesting link with many similarities with Figuera's foundation. In that link they talk abouth Bloch Wall disconnection and reconnection as the common denominator in many OU devices. We are talking here with Figuera about moving the Bloch Wall.


http://overunity.com/8227/bloch-wall-disconnect-and-reconnect-the-final-design/









[/size]

[/size]

Doug1

Hannon

The term recycle is a lose terminology. Energy is stored in a conductor in the magnetic field. When the electric field or current is changing to lower value in potential the magnetic field also lowers and induction returns some power back to the circuit from the collapsing magnetic field. Example being when a circuit is lighting up a light bulb but first has to charge up a magnet the time before the bulb lights is the time spent on charging up the magnet so the current can pass through the magnet to reach the bulb with enough potential to cause it to light. There is a measure of time for this to happen provided there is enough power to begin with and not so much that the time is so short you dont even notice the delay. Other conditions excluded from the explanation such as additional forms of resistance in the circuit or the condition of parallel or series of those others.
  Once you get over splitting hairs of word meanings you can re-examine G and the few parts it is made up of. As the field from N or S retards power is sent back into G at which time you have to start looking at it from the point of view of an amplifier. Where now you have two sources of input which if combined at the right time increase the output of G to the next increasing inducer. If the core becomes over saturated by ether input its dead. Since the goal is to be self sustained plowing it full of current from ether source from the start is counter productive since as a generator it will produce power over time enough to operate itself and do work. It needs a short period of time to come up to its operating minimum output. How ells will you know if it is producing anything more then the input to start it if you keep it full from the source and never let it start to do it's thing. That is partially why trying to operate it off ac mains for the source makes no sense. Im sure if you want to see how much money you can waste it could be done but why?

marathonman

I have always liked the way you explain things. having an imagination then using the information you have given then applying that to the device always helped in understanding it's operation. of course most on this thread have troubles in this area.
glad your bowl of nuts are empty at this time, nice and quiet.

as always, some people are more occupied with other devices then the device in question and has absolutely nothing in common with each other or it's operations. the preoccupation with association is rather rediculas to say the least and only conferms ones nonunderstanding of the device.

always a pleasure Mr Doug.

MM

hanon

Just to post in this forum what I already stated in EF forum. I think the toroid part G is an optimization over the method described in the patent and may excite the electromagnets with lower energy consumption. I just post it here to write it into this forum but I wont go into further discussion.


I have two technicals questions about the toroid as an alleged energy recycling device:


1- How can you allegedly recycle the energy in the toroid and electromagnets back (--->) and forth (<---) through the same only wire without reversing the magnetic polarity in the electromagnets which are filling and emptying through just that only wire?


2- Current always flows toward lower potential sites. If energy is going back and forth between the toroid and the electromagnets then if in one way is flowing toward a lower potential site, the reverse way is flowing toward a higher potential site. All this connected always with the battery at the same time. Is the toroid increasing and decreasing in potential in each half cycle? Impossible in my view.


The toroid will work to regulate the two currents but nor it is mandatory neither it will recycle back and forth the energy. Current in this device always flow in the same direction to keep always the same polarity in the poles of the electromagnets.