Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[charly2]

Gracias por tu respuesta, este proximo fin de semana le dedicare algo de tiempo en pruebas para tratar de aclarar en mi mente lo que esta pasando.
Sin embargo las bobinas son muy pequeñas y tienen una inductancia muy baja y siento que no me estan ayudando con el consumo en vacio o sin carga, tratare de corregir un poco la impedancia en los 2 electroimanes ya sea con algun capacitor o aumentando las vueltas.
Ademas el nucleo de ferrita que tengo se puede considerar practicamente como una sola pieza sin espacios entre las bobinas, creo que eso tambien debe afectar algo ya que la corriente Lenz inducida por la carga en la salida va en sentido contrario al del electroiman encendido en ese momento y si todo esta acoplado magneticamente por el nucleo claramente hay un choque de polaridades magneticas en el nucleo que resta eficiencia.... eso creo...

Saludos

------

Thanks for your answer, this weekend I will spend some time in tests in order to try to clarify in my mind what is happening.
However the coils are very small and have a very low inductance and I feel that they are not helping me with the consumption without load, I will try to correct a little the impedance in the 2 electromagnets either with some capacitor or increasing the number of turns.
In addition the ferrite core that I have can be considered practically as a single piece without spaces between the coils, I believe that this must also affect something since the Lenz current induced by the load at the output goes in the opposite direction of the electromagnet firing in that moment and if everything is magnetically coupled by the core clearly there is a crash of magnetic polarities that lowers the efficiency .... I guess ...
regards

[ignacio]

charly2: veo que lo tienes bastante claro.
Circuito resonante, condensador bobina, paralelo serie, buena imaginación, idea buena. Condensador en la salida de las colectoras (nivelar carga)  consumo.
Intenta los núcleos de las bobinas colectoras, aislarlos de las bobinas inductoras.
Como  he explicado; yo uso, vaso lleno de agua con dos electrodos dentro, así  regulo el amperaje (mas separado - menos amperios, mas juntos - mas amperios) Dándome además, que no retorne más  electricidad a la entrada de alimentación.
SD:: Cada bobina tiene 260 vueltas de alambre calibre 30 y 6.5 ohms cada una>> "Yo" las inductoras, les daría solo con 40 o 60 vueltas, 1 a 1,5 ohms. Las colectoras correcto, 260 vueltas 30 y 6,5 ohms.
AWG 30 – 0,20 amperios, si tienes " 4 colectoras" 2 interiores con X voltios y 2 exteriores con 2 ½ X voltios = 3X voltios;;; En serie 3X voltios y 0,20 amperios. En paralelo 1X voltios y 0,60 amperios. ¿OK?
Saludos y salud
Traductor google:
Charly2: I see you have it quite clear.
Resonant circuit, capacitor coil, parallel series, good imagination, good idea. Condenser at the outlet of the collectors (leveling load) consumption.
Try the cores of the collector coils, isolate them from the inductor coils.
As I explained; I use, full glass of water with two electrodes inside, so I regulate the amperage (more separated - less amps, more together - more amps) Also give me no more electricity to return to the power supply.
SD :: Each coil has 260 turns of 30 gauge wire and 6.5 ohms each >> "I" the inductors, I would give them only with 40 or 60 turns, 1 to 1.5 ohms. The correct collectors, 260 turns 30 and 6.5 ohms.
AWG 30 - 0.20 amps, if you have "4 collectors" 2 interiors with X volts and 2 exteriors with 2 ½ X volts = 3X volts; In series 3X volts and 0.20 amps. In parallel 1X volts and 0.60 amps. OKAY?
Greetings and health

[marathonman]

Total deviation from the Figuera device thus becomes NOT the Figuera device.
imagine that.

MM

[Mem]

Yes, it's super darn easy to drift away from the original circuit.  In my case I tried to make this exactly how Mr. Figuera did it but using today's semiconductors [/size]components instead of mechanical switches.   I am convinced would be much better making this full electronic version rather than[/size] using reed switches, but it was my firs try and turn out to be quite in  interesting.  See the short video that I made here.  https://youtu.be/8fdrZoI2E_4?t=172


The circuit looks simple but it's totally mind twister! 

[citfta]

Hi Mem,

That is an interesting circuit you have designed.  However there is one mistake in the 555 PWM circuit.  One of the 1N4148 diodes needs to be flipped over.  I found the same circuit you are showing with the same mistake.  After you flip one of the diodes then you can get a full range of 5% to 95% motor speed.

I was also wondering if the mosfets get hot with your circuit.  They usually like to be fully on or off.  Running them partly on usually makes them get pretty warm or hot.

Carroll