Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

 I HAVE MADE A REVISION TO THE DOCUMENT. I REVISED THE PATENT FIGURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS FORUM. I ALSO REVISED SOME OF THE WRITE UP AND FIGURES TO INDICATE THAT THE FLUX AND THE VOLTAGE SHOULD BE 90 DEGREES OUT OF PHASE. THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT EXPLAINED IN THE DOCUMENT IS STILL THE SAME.

THANKS!
BAJAC

[kEhYo77]

@Bajac
I think that you are wrong in your assumptions of '90 degree' phase shift between Vps,Ips of North/South primaries! (As stated earlier in my posts).
In your 'revised' document on Fig.21, at the 'M' mark, magnetic fields of both primaries are equal as they should be but their magnitudes at this point should be exactly HALF of their maximum magnitudes but they are not! They are both more like 2/3 of their Bmax!

Respectfully

kEhYo

[kEhYo77]

I got the new setup ready for testing...
I've built an Arduino based variable frequency flip-flop pulse driver that can be set manually or automatically (not yet implemented). I can generate pulses of precise length and frequency up to 30kHz.


The base is like Figuera's Generator plus additional magnetic shunt on the secondary (alternative magnetic path for the CEMF flux)...


Testing should start on the weekend, as I am a bit sick now.

[bajac]

 Because of my workload, I do not have too much time to spend at the forum. I just wanted to give you an update of the experiments I am performing. I will continue running more tests for the following two weeks. I have not yet tested the secondary coil with a load. First, I want to maximize the design of the primary circuit.
Please, refer to the following link for the images: http://imageshack.us/g/1/9909982/
IMAGE No. 1:
Shows the setup that I am using: the Arduino controller, the breadboard with the driver, the seven resistors (200 ohms each), and the primary and secondary coils.
IMAGE No. 2:
Shows two 50Ω/50W resistors used as dummy loads to replace the primary coils.
IMAGE No. 3:
Shows the output voltages dropped across the two 50Ω/50W dummy resistors replacing the primary coils. Each scope probe is set at x10. Notice that the small voltage steps are followed by a large jump in voltage. The frequency of the voltages is about 68Hz
IMAGE No. 4:
Shows the setup of IMAGE #3 but with seven 10 ohms resistors instead of the 200Ω. The scope probes are set at x1. Notice that the voltage steps are better defined.
This is an important design criterion to be applied when using the resistors as shown in the patent. The value of the resistors must be optimized for the impedances of the primary coils. If the resistors are too high the voltage steps are small and large at positions 1 and 8 as shown in image 3. On the other hand, if the resistors are too small, the DC component of the primary current would be too high, which increases the primary current considerably.
IMAGE No. 5:
Shows the setup of IMAGE #4 but with the primary coils connected instead of the dummy resistors. No load is connected at the secondary coil. There is no DC voltage component at the coils, as expected. The controller and the driver are working fine because there are no voltage spikes. The transitions of the power transistors are make-before-break. The scope probes are set at x10.
When the loads are pure resistive as in IMAGE #4, the minimum and maximum values of the voltages occur when the transistors at positions 1 and 8 are on. When the primary coils are connected, the minimum voltage value occur at about positions 3 and 5.
IMAGE No. 6:
The top graph corresponds to the voltage drop across a primary coil with no DC component. The scope probe is set at x10. The bottom graph represents the current flowing through the same coil and corresponds to the voltage drop across the 0.25 Ohms resistor used as a shunt resistor. There is a DC component. The first x-axis from the bottom corresponds to zero voltage. The scope probe is set at x1. A design goal should be to minimize the DC component applied to the primary coils. Notice that even though the voltage applied to the coil changes in steps, the changes of the current through the coil is smooth. As expected, the current in an inductor cannot change instantaneously.
I am giving you some test bench information that can be helpful for constructing the model.
Wonju-Bajac
PS: this will be my last reference to the issue of the resistors being used as a current splitter and/or the phase shift of the primaries. I just wanted to provide an analysis of a current splitter using six (6) resistors as shown in image 7. The results of the calculations indicate that the sum of the two currents is not always a constant when using resistor loads. But, with the primary inductor coils, it could be a different story.

[bajac]

 My experiments are moving slowly because I am building more coil sets of the transformer. I have not tested the circuit for over unity, yet. However, I did short circuit the secondary coil with a screwdriver and sparks were generated melting the wires to the screwdriver. The most interesting thing is that a change in the total primary current was not noticeable.
Refer to the following link for more images:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/9/imageno8setup.jpg/
IMAGE_No.8:
Shows the equipment setup. Heat sinks were added to the IGBTs. I also built a variable DC voltage power supply.
IMAGE_No.9:
Shows the reference x-axes channel 1 (above) and channel 2 (below).
IMAGE_No.10:
Shows the voltage of a primary coil (channel 1) and the total primary current Ipn+Ips (channel 2). NOTICE THAT THE TOTAL PRIMARY DC CURRENT IS NOT CONSTANT!
Channel 1 => 10V/Div
Channel 2 => 4A/Div
The conditions for the testing are:
Power supply Vdc = 25.30V input; Vac = 15.45Vrms; Iac≈1.30A input; primary turns = 100t; secondary turns = 219t.
Resistors:
8Ω/20W, 10Ω/10W, 10Ω/10W, 10Ω/10W, 10Ω/10W, 10Ω/10W, 8Ω/20W,
IMAGE_No.11:
Shows the secondary output voltage
Channel 1 => 20V/Div
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
I will keep you posted.
[/font]
Bajac    [/font]